As a wildfire of revolt whips through the Middle East and North Africa, the White House is embracing pragmatism and shying away from embroidering a grand “Obama doctrine” for a region in turmoil.
For a politician as fond of the grand gesture as US President Barack Obama, the idea of an eponymous school of foreign policy thought might seem tempting.
After all, presidents have long etched their names in history with monumental doctrines or clear prescriptions of principles rationalizing the US’ posture to a treacherous world.
Former US president James Monroe’s 1823 doctrine, for instance, told Europe’s meddling colonial powers to keep out of the new US backyard in the Western hemisphere.
Meanwhile, former US president Harry Truman’s doctrine committed the US to a generational battle with communism.
However, analysts and officials say that while Obama has laid out general principles to deal with the “Arab spring,” he is eschewing a rigid US philosophy for a region in tumult.
His actions toward each -turmoil-wracked nation are different and do not adhere to a laid-down system of rules.
“The closest we have to a policy is to allow the different revolutions to take place at their own pace, based on the timing of the people involved and intervening only through general statements of support,” Princeton University’s Julian Zelizer said. “Other than that I don’t think there is any consistent principle.”
Asked for his Middle East “doctrine,” Obama replied on Thursday: “No. 1, no violence against citizens; No. 2, that we stand for freedom and democracy.”
While not ruling out military action, he said the US must not become a player in the Libyan — or any other — revolt, to avoid a backlash in a region that reviles the US invasion of Iraq and is stained by colonialism.
“One of the extraordinary successes of Egypt was the full ownership that the Egyptian people felt for that transformation,” Obama said. “We did not see anti--American sentiment arising out of that movement in Egypt precisely because they felt that we hadn’t tried to engineer or impose a particular outcome.”
The administration has often seemed to be making policy on the hoof during the Arab revolts, a factor reflected in its difficulty in framing a consistent message.
While Obama called for Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Qaddafi to go and eventually sought to push former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak out, US pressure has been more subtle on allies like Bahrain and Yemen, stopping short of regime change.
However, at the same time the White House has openly taunted its foe Iran over demonstrations.
Obama aides argue that a “one size fits all” doctrine is inappropriate.
“Each country is different. Each situation that we have encountered in the region in the past number of weeks has been different,” Obama spokesman Jay Carney said.
Anthony Cordesman, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Obama’s approach was rooted more in pragmatism than political dogma.
“You have a doctrine when you have an enduring policy that you’re constantly applying or you state,” Cordesman said, adding that Obama had not acted in such a way.
Obama’s insistence that the US can not engineer outcomes has exposed him to domestic political attacks.
Critics charge he was too slow to support uprisings in Iran following Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s disputed re-election in 2009.
As Egypt erupted, Obama was accused of being “on the wrong side of history” as the masses demanded Mubarak’s ouster.
Now, with an apparent terror raging in Tripoli, Obama is again under pressure — as calls mount for a US-policed no-fly zone.
And while operating without a doctrine and keeping the US out of internal politics may turn out to be a good long-term bet, it gives an opening to critics who say Obama lacks coherence and foreign policy leadership skills.
The closest Obama has come to a “doctrine” for the Middle East came in his speech to the Muslim world in Cairo in 2009 which appears to explain his actions toward the Arab revolts.
“Let me be clear: no system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other,” Obama said, breaking with former US president George W. Bush’s era of regime change policies. “That does not lessen my commitment, however, to governments that reflect the will of the people.”
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was