Thu, Dec 23, 2010 - Page 7 News List

Africa has two species of elephants rather than one

Reuters, CHICAGO

Instead of one species of elephant, Africa has two, researchers said on Tuesday, confirming suspicions about the two distinctly different-looking pachyderms.

Using gene sequencing tools, teams from Harvard, the University of Illinois and the University of York in Britain have shown that instead of being the same species — as scientists have long believed — the African savanna elephant and the smaller African forest elephant are distant cousins, having been largely separated for 2 million to 7 million years.

“What our study suggests is forest and savanna elephants are very distantly related to each other and not just subspecies or populations of the same species,” said Alfred Roca of the University of Illinois, who worked on the study published in the Public Library of Science journal PLoS Biology.

The teams compared the genetic code of modern elephants from Africa and Asia to DNA taken from two extinct species — the woolly mammoth and the American mastodon.

“The surprising finding is that forest and savanna elephants from Africa — which some have argued are the same species — are as distinct from each other as Asian elephants and mammoths,” David Reich of Harvard Medical School in Boston, who worked on the study, said in a statement.

Africa’s forest and savanna elephants are vastly different in size. The savanna elephant is roughly double the weight of the forest elephant at 5.4 to 6.3 tonnes and measures about 3.5m tall at the shoulder — about 1m taller than the forest elephant.

Even so, many scientists had thought the two populations of elephants came from the same species, in part because they mated and produced offspring.

Not so, says Michi Hofreiter, an expert in ancient DNA from York.

“The divergence of the two species took place around the time of the divergence of the Asian elephant and woolly mammoths,” Hofreiter said in a statement. “The split between African savanna and forest elephants is almost as old as the split between humans and chimpanzees. This result amazed us all.”

On a practical basis, the study means that conservationists will need to think about the two species differently.

This story has been viewed 1229 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top