Pritpal Singh, who runs the Faridkot clinic, said the numbers of children affected by the pollution had risen dramatically in the past six or seven years. But he said that the Indian authorities appeared determined to bury the scandal.
“They can’t just detoxify these kids, they have to detoxify the whole Punjab. That is the reason for their reluctance,” he said. “They threatened us and said if we didn’t stop commenting on what’s happening, they would close our clinic. But I decided that if I kept silent it would go on for years and no one would do anything about it. If I keep silent then the next day it will be my child. The children are dying in front of me.”
Carin Smit, the South African clinical metal toxicologist who arranged for the tests to be carried out in Germany, said that the situation could no longer be ignored.
“There is evidence of harm for these children in my care and ... it is an imperative that their bodies be cleaned up and their metabolisms be supported to deal with such a devastating presence of radioactive material,” she said. “If the contamination is as widespread as it would appear to be — as far west as Muktsar on the Pakistani border, and as far east as the foothills of Himachal Pradesh — then millions are at high risk and every new baby born to a contaminated mother is at risk.”
India’s reluctance to acknowledge the problem is hardly unexpected: the country is heavily committed to an expansion of thermal plants in Punjab and other states. Neither was it any surprise when a team of scientists from the Department of Atomic Energy visited the area and concluded that while the concentration of uranium in drinking water was “slightly high,” there was “nothing to worry” about. Yet some tests recorded levels of uranium in the ground water as high as 224mcg/l (micrograms per liter) — 15 times higher than the safe level of 15mcg/l recommended by the WHO. The US Environmental Protection Agency sets a maximum safe level of 20mcg/l.
Tests on ground water in villages in Bathinda district found the highest average concentration of uranium — 56.95mcg/l — in the town of Bucho Mandi, a short distance from the Lehra Mohabat ash pond. Such a concentration of uranium means the lifetime cancer risk in the village was more than 153 times higher than in the normal population. Tests on ground water in the village of Jai Singh Wala, close to the Bathinda ash pond, showed an average level of 52.79mcg/l. People living there said they used the ash to spread on the roads and even on the floors of their homes.
Scientists in Punjab who have studied the presence of uranium in the state have dismissed the government denials as a whitewash.
“If the government says there is a high level of uranium in an area that would create havoc — they don’t want to openly say something like that,” said Chander Parkash, a wetland ecologist working at Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.
Both he and Surinder Singh, who works at the same university and has also carried out tests on the state’s ground water, said it was clear that uranium was present in large quantities and should be investigated further.
A previous report in the magazine Scientific American, citing various sources, claimed that fly ash emitted by power plants “carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy,” adding: “When coal is burned into fly ash, uranium and thorium are concentrated at up to 10 times their original levels.”
RSS