Arthur biographer Thomas Reeves, a former University of Wisconsin history professor who wrote Gentleman Boss in 1975, debunked the born-in-Canada claim.
“This was a little campaign trick, in an era when politics were just as dirty as they are now,” Reeves said in an interview. “It didn’t threaten him in anyway. He was lying about his age, which complicated things. Like so many people, he just lopped a year off his life.”
But the legend lingers.
In 1998, the Ottawa Citizen newspaper published a story asserting Arthur was born in his grandparents’ home in Dunham but “probably” appropriated the birth records of the dead brother.
“The great impostor, the ultimate spoilsman, has never been defrocked. Not bad for a Canadian, eh?” said the newspaper, which called Arthur “our man in Washington.”
At the Chester A. Arthur Historic Site, which draws about 400 visitors a year despite its remote setting, the topic is the first thing on people’s lips, caretaker Shirley Paradee said.
“That’s usually pretty much the most-asked question — if he was born here or in Canada,” she said. “And I don’t really have an answer for that because there isn’t anything, any proof anywhere, where he was born.”
If anything, the display boards inside a two-room replica of the parsonage where Arthur spent some of his early years fan the controversy. One contains a quote from a “J.H. Corey” who asserted in 1881: “I am positive C.A. Arthur was born in Canada.”
Another reads: “Today, in an era when virtually every detail of a politician’s life is open to public view, there is no concrete proof of the location of President Arthur’s birthplace. Records and recollections lend strong support to the claim that Arthur was born in Fairfield, Vt.”
For his part, Dumville says Vermont is proud to call Arthur a native son. Until someone proves otherwise.
“There’s no way to prove he was not born in Vermont. It’s a little boosterism for Vermont, having a US president born here,” Dumville said.
RSS