Arab states — and Israel — are watching intently as Iran’s political convulsions continue, seeking clues to how the unfolding crisis will affect the strategic picture in the Middle East, especially the key issue of the Islamic republic’s nuclear ambitions.
In a region where democratic politics are the exception, there is nervousness about the implications of people power on the streets of Tehran. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is deeply unpopular — but mass protests worry all autocrats.
ISRAEL
Officially and in public, at least, Israeli officials have spoken of their deep concern about Ahmadinejad’s apparent re-election. Israel’s rightwing government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has made a priority of challenging Iran’s nuclear ambitions. On Sunday night, Netanyahu said the world’s greatest challenge today was “the nexus between radical Islam and nuclear weapons.”
However, in private, Israeli officials appeared to be hoping for an Ahmadinejad victory even before the polls opened, despite his vitriolic criticism of Israel, his denial of the Holocaust and his apparent eagerness for a nuclear weapons program.
Israeli newspapers quoted several senior officials anonymously saying a win for Ahmadinejad would help Israel because, as they saw it, none of the candidates differed very much on policy and Ahmadinejad’s strong language and blunt actions made him easier to criticize internationally.
“Considering the circumstances, he is the best thing that ever happened to us,” one foreign ministry official was quoted as saying in the popular Ma’ariv newspaper last Friday.
Ben Caspit, a Ma’ariv columnist, put it even more bluntly that morning: “If you have friends in Iran, try to convince them to vote for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today ... There is no one who will serve Israel’s PR interests better.”
Far fewer were the voices who questioned that line of thinking. Among them was Aluf Benn, a Ha’aretz columnist who dismissed the support for Ahmadinejad as a “blatant manifestation of the narrow horizons of Israeli strategic thinking.”
LEBANON
Recently emerging from their own political upheavals, savvy Lebanese see much of themselves in the people politics unfolding in Tehran.
“It reminds me of our protests,” said Haitham Chamas, an activist who helped organize protests in 2005 that brought 1 million Lebanese to the streets calling for democratic reforms and the fall of the government.
Just as in Tehran, that opposition was swiftly answered by a huge rally in support of the incumbent regime, organized then by Hezbollah, which is allied with Iran and Syria.
Chamas and friends have spent the last week talking of little else but what the historic events unfolding in Iran could mean for Lebanon, where Iranian financing of Hezbollah has divided opinion like never before.
The Western-backed government, known as March 14, recently beat Hezbollah and its allies in undisputed elections.
“I think if [defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein] Mousavi’s supporters stay on the streets for a week the regime will fall and that will seriously affect Hezbollah,” Chamas said.
Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, was quick to congratulate Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on his disputed re-election, saying it represented “great hope to all the oppressed people.”
RSS