Ministers will be forced to make the most savage spending cuts since the 1970s, a respected economic think tank predicted on Thursday, confounding British Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling’s attempt to deflect claims that his budget has ushered in a decade of austerity.
The London-based Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that even big spending cuts in health and schools may not be enough to fill the structural deficit in the nation’s finances.
Robert Chote, the institute’s director, said that by 2017 or 2018 the loss through tax increases and cuts in public spending would be equivalent to £2,840 (US$4,150) a year for every family in the country — only half of which has been accounted for by the government.
The institute calculated that there is a £45 billion black hole in the finances, requiring further tax increases of £1,430 per family or massive spending cuts. While it predicted that most of the hole would be filled by cuts, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne was quick to condemn Labour’s “secret tax bombshell.”
Darling avoided mention of spending cuts in his budget speech, concentrating on a 0.7 percent a year increase in spending from 2011, which excludes investment in key areas such as schools and hospitals. But the institute pointed to the 17 percent annual cuts in investment spending from 2011 to 2012, which will see it halved in three years, and concluded that total spending would fall by 0.1 percent a year over that period.
Once the effect of the 8 percent annual growth in debt interest payments and rising spending on unemployment benefit are stripped out, spending across government departments will have to fall by an average of 2.3 percent a year in real terms, institute economist Gemma Tetlow said. Cuts of this order were last seen in the 70s.
She said that with the government pledged to continue increasing spending on overseas aid, it was likely that all other departments would face spending cuts.
“Health, education, law and order would all experience real cuts,” she said.
Chote said it looked likely that the bulk of the savings required over the coming eight years would mainly come from spending cuts rather than new taxes.
“The main burden of the looming tightening — at least over the next few years — is likely to fall on the users of public services,” he said.
At the same time, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown was fighting off claims that the new 50 percent top rate of income tax imposed on those earning more than £150,000 (US$220,000) marked the death of the New Labour project, the old British Labour party as repackaged by former prime minister Tony Blair and Brown in the 1990s.
Brown and Darling were encouraged by initial poll projections that the new top rate was popular with more than half the electorate.
But a separate poll for the Politics Home Web site showed 53 percent of those polled not believing the chancellor’s economic forecasts that growth would surge back to 1.25 percent next year and 3.5 percent in 2011. Only 9 percent had full faith in the forecast.
Secretary of State for Business Peter Mandelson pleaded with the electorate to judge the government’s budget decisions and the recovery in a year’s time.
In interviews yesterday, Darling conceded public spending was being constrained, but dismissed suggestions that the cuts were of Thatcherite dimensions, arguing that public spending was at a far higher overall level than in the 1980s. New hospitals and schools only had to be built once, he said.
“I believe after a shock to the system such as we have had, we have to ask ourselves about every pound we spend. I know what I have set out will be tough,” he said.
“This secret tax bombshell of £1,430 per family was not even announced by the chancellor on Wednesday. It shows what a dishonest budget it was and how quickly it is unravelling,” Osborne said. “Britain has moved from the age of prosperity to an age of austerity, but the leadership of the Labour party has been completely left behind by events.”
SEEKING CHANGE: A hospital worker said she did not vote in previous elections, but ‘now I can see that maybe my vote can change the system and the country’ Voting closed yesterday across the Solomon Islands in the south Pacific nation’s first general election since the government switched diplomatic allegiance from Taiwan to Beijing and struck a secret security pact that has raised fears of the Chinese navy gaining a foothold in the region. The Solomon Islands’ closer relationship with China and a troubled domestic economy weighed on voters’ minds as they cast their ballots. As many as 420,000 registered voters had their say across 50 national seats. For the first time, the national vote also coincided with elections for eight of the 10 local governments. Esther Maeluma cast her vote in the
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was