An attempt to distract university students in Maryland from late-night drinking with a feature-length porn movie was blocked on Thursday after state senators threatened to cut funds for the college.
The two-and-a-half-hour Pirates II: Stagnetti’s Revenge — the most expensive pornographic film ever made, at a cost of US$10 million — would have been shown at a University of Maryland student union theater today.
Organizers at the College Park campus, 16km north of Washington, had championed educational aspects of the screening, with health group Planned Parenthood planning to hold a presentation on safe sex practices beforehand.
The event was also previously seen by university officials as an “alternative to late-night drinking and other dangerous activities,” the Baltimore Sun reported before the cancelation.
Republican state senator Andy Harris, however, proposed an amendment to the state budget to deny millions of dollars in funding for any educational institutions that screen a porn movie.
Harris said he had been “shocked and dismayed” to hear the college was going to screen the movie, and denounced what he described as the “dangers of pornography.”
He said he was “extremely concerned that the policy of our public colleges and universities would allow hardcore pornography” to be shown.
“I am pleased to know that the university did the right thing and canceled this movie. However, I remain concerned that they do not have a policy prohibiting this,” the senator said in a statement after the university reversed its decision.
Harris said he was “working to seek assurances that this will not happen again.”
The Sun said that during a lengthy debate on Thursday morning at the state legislature in Annapolis, Maryland, senate president Thomas Miller indicated he would back Harris’ threat to cut millions of dollars in funding.
Linda Clement, the university’s vice president of student affairs, denied the cancelation was linked to threats made by state lawmakers.
“No, we canceled the [showing] because the educational context of the movie has been lost in the titillation that’s been associated with the movie itself,” Clement’s spokesman Millree Williams said.
“That’s hard to believe,” responded Adam Kissel, director of the Individual Rights Defense Program at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The university’s claim, he said, was extremely unlikely because beforehand “university administrators had known about it, had expected it to go on and they had no problem with it.”
Kissel said his education rights group was “very concerned” about the likely constitutional violation, namely the First Amendment that protects free speech.