It is the divorce case with everything: an aging, rich husband; a 180cm, much younger, blonde Swedish countess wife; allegations of affairs and forced sex and an unseemly squabble for US$100 million.
No wonder the marital problems of George David, the 66-year-old chairman of United Technologies, and his soon-to-be ex-wife, Countess Marie Douglas-David, 36, have captivated the US public in a case that has been dubbed the divorce of the century.
In times of recession-induced anxiety, tabloid newspapers have had a field day with the lurid details of the marital collapse that has played out in a Connecticut courtroom. Jim Shea, a columnist for the local Hartford Courant, said the spat was “the ultimate divorce steel-cage match.”
PHOTO: AP
The heart of the issue is simple, though one for which many ordinary struggling Americans might have little sympathy. The countess has been offered US$43 million as a settlement but says it is not enough to fund her lifestyle. So she is suing for US$100 million.
“She always wants more, more, more. Too much is never enough,” said George David’s lawyer, Anne Dranginis.
Not surprisingly that has not endeared her to segments of the tabloid press. “Divorce diva demands $100m for bare essentials,” said one headline in the New York Post.
PHOTO : AP
To back up her claims, Douglas-David filed papers in court showing she needed at least US$53,000 a week to cover her living expenses, including US$4,500 a week for clothes, US$8,000 for travel and US$1,500 for eating out. Douglas-David argued that her husband’s offer would not fund such a lifestyle for longer than 15 years and as a result she had no choice but to go to court.
But it is the appalling behavior of the protagonists, ruthlessly detailed by their legal teams last week, that has truly riveted the public. Neither party comes out of the case looking good, or, indeed, even mildly versed in decent behavior.
Douglas-David has portrayed her husband as an emotionally cold control freak who spent several hundred thousand dollars on her each week, but created a “golden cage.” She has accused him of having an affair, of teasing her about being childless, of showing no sympathy after a miscarriage and of refusing to give her any control of her own money.
She has claimed he once told her: “If you improve and behave, you can have in-vitro fertilization.”
She has also claimed that he taunted her with separation threats as a form of sexual foreplay, serving divorce papers four separate times and then wooing her back into the marital bed, sometimes on the same day.
David did not help his own cause. In one piece of testimony, he denied that Douglas-David gave him valuable financial advice about his business.
“I don’t remember specific conversations with Marie ... it’s like you go home and talk to the dog,” he told a stunned court.
But David was not the only sinner. In his evidence, he has detailed how Douglas-David tried to serve her own divorce papers in the spectacular setting of a marriage guidance session, which he was attending alone. His lawyers have also detailed an affair the countess allegedly had with a Swedish fencing champion. David spent almost US$250,000 to hire five private investigators to track the pair in Stockholm.
Indeed, David’s lawyers have sought to portray Douglas-David as a sexual predator who bullied her husband into sex. David said his wife had frequently physically forced him to have sex, in effect raping him. Taking the stand, David was asked about one particular liaison with her in Sweden.
“That was against your will, wasn’t it?” his lawyer said.
“Yes, it was,” David replied.
Perhaps Andrea Peyser, a New York Post writer, summed up public reaction best, in a “plague on both your houses” column about the unhappy couple.
“Take the dough, baby, and scoot away on your stilettos for the nearest baby daddy,” she advised the countess. “You can always find another rich mega-creep.”
The pair married in 2002 and Douglas-David gave up her job as a vice-president at Lazard Asset Management a year later.
They lived the high life together, hobnobbing with the likes of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and traveling the world.
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of