British Prime Minister Gordon Brown won a “hollow” and “shaming” victory after lawmakers narrowly backed plans to hold terror suspects for up to six weeks without charge, the British press said yesterday.
The government survived a rebellion of 36 ruling Labour Party members of parliament (MP) and scraped a victory on the anti-terror proposals by a nine-vote margin, with rumors rife of a deal with Northern Ireland’s biggest Protestant party to guarantee the winning margin.
“Last night, Gordon Brown faced personal humiliation over his plan to extend detention without charge,” the Times wrote in its editorial.
“In his effort to avoid this fate, he has humiliated Westminster instead,” it said.
The right-of-center paper said the vote was won “by browbeating MPs on what should have been an issue of conscience, and with thinly disguised bribery when browbeating did not work.”
“This hollow victory will buy him time in the Westminster village, but at a sad and further cost to parliament’s prestige,” it said.
The right-wing Daily Telegraph took a similar tone, asking why, if Brown stood his ground after enduring weeks of criticism for being indecisive, his victory feels “so much like a defeat?”
“Mr Brown has won the day, but reports of him beseeching MPs for their votes, and trickling out so many concessions that the legislation now resembles a dog’s breakfast, have done little to enhance his authority,” the paper wrote.
“All are agreed that eradicating the terrorist threat is vitally important — far too important to be treated as a party political football in this way,” it said.
Even the normally sympathetic Daily Mirror tabloid was critical, arguing that “locking up suspects for six weeks is likely to prove disastrously counter-productive.”
“The premier [sic] needs to focus on a long list of specific issues that really concern people, such as petrol and food prices,” it said.
The Independent said that even though Brown “will believe he has secured for himself a slightly longer lease on his premiership,” the thin margin of victory and the various concessions he was forced to dole out “only exposed his weakness and lack of authority.”
“It is no credit to the way of British politics that, in the very short term, the government’s petty inducements and bullying arm-twisting paid off,” the paper wrote in its editorial.
Only the Sun, the country’s most widely read daily, was supportive of the prime minister, describing him as having “stood up for the fight against extremism in the face of deeply hostile criticism and predictions of disaster.”
“The same cannot be said for the opposition who seemed more concerned about narrow self-interest than the national interest,” it said.
It continued: “Yes, it was a narrow government margin — just nine votes.”
“But that was enough to give police and security services the tools they need to test complex evidence against dangerous extremists,” it said.
The Guardian, a left-wing daily, summed up the general mood in yesterday’s newspapers, however, writing that Brown “won last night’s divisive vote — just — but lost the argument and shredded his majority.”
“The prime minister did not win last night because he convinced parliament of his case, but thanks to backroom deals,” it said. “It was a forced victory in the worst of circumstances, a law no one wants imposed by a government that wanted to look strong but ended up too weak to accept the obvious.”
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
‘DELUSIONAL’: Targeting the families of Hamas’ leaders would not push the group to change its position or to give up its demands for Palestinians, Ismail Haniyeh said Israeli aircraft on Wednesday killed three sons of Hamas’ top political leader in the Gaza Strip, striking high-stakes targets at a time when Israel is holding delicate ceasefire negotiations with the militant group. Hamas said four of the leader’s grandchildren were also killed. Ismail Haniyeh’s sons are among the highest-profile figures to be killed in the war so far. Israel said they were Hamas operatives, and Haniyeh accused Israel of acting in “the spirit of revenge and murder.” The deaths threatened to strain the internationally mediated ceasefire talks, which appeared to gain steam in recent days even as the sides remain far
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of