Few in South Africa took much notice when five sleeping teenage boys were shot by a military hit squad just days before the country's last white president, F.W. de Klerk, received his Nobel peace prize for ending apartheid.
But 13 years later the deaths have returned to haunt de Klerk after a decision to prosecute one of his former Cabinet ministers for apartheid-era crimes prompted fresh scrutiny of what South Africa's last white president knew about the campaign of assassinations, bombings and torture against the regime's opponents.
The man once lauded across the globe for freeing former president Nelson Mandela and ending white rule now faces headlines at home declaring "You're a murderer too, FW!" and accusations that his Nobel prize "is soaked in blood."
Former enemies, and some of those who served the apartheid security apparatus, are questioning de Klerk's claim that he knew nothing about police and military hit squads and other illegal covert activities.
Among his accusers is Eugene de Kock, the ex-commander of a police murder squad who is serving a 212-year prison sentence. He says he has "new evidence" against de Klerk who he described in an interview to a Johannesburg radio station as an "unconvicted murderer."
But the accusations have created a backlash among some whites who say that if there are to be prosecutions for politically-motivated crimes then many at the top of the ruling African National Congress should also stand trial.
De Klerk has acknowledged that there was a strategy to murder prominent anti-apartheid activists but says it was carried out by rogue elements within the security forces and he was horrified when he found out years later. At a press conference in Cape Town, his voice cracked with emotion as he said he was being unfairly implicated.
"I am not standing here to defend myself. On these issues my conscience is clear. I am owed a fair deal in my own country," he said. "I was never part of policies that said murder is fine, cold- blooded murder is fine, rape is fine, torture is fine."
He said the accusations were intended to strip him, and the 70 percent of whites who supported his reforms in a 1992 referendum, of an "honorable place at the table as co-creators of the new South Africa."
The spotlight shifted to de Klerk after his former law and order minister, Adriaan Vlok, was charged last month with attempted murder for ordering a police hit squad to poison an anti-apartheid leader, the Reverend Frank Chikane, who survived and is now the director-general of President Thabo Mbeki's office.
Johannesburg newspapers reported that Vlok is striking a plea bargain in which he implicates de Klerk.
The former president has denied that his law and order minister consulted him before ordering the murder attempt. But de Klerk has not denied ordering the 1993 raid, in which the five boys were killed, on what was described as a Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) safe house used to plan "terrorist attacks."
After the attack, the military said the dead were men who were armed and shooting but photographs of the scene showed the boys still in their beds, riddled with bullets and no guns in sight. De Klerk later described the killings as a tragic mistake.
Sigqibo Mpendulo, a PAC activist who was imprisoned on Robben Island for five years and lost his twin 16-year-old sons in the attack, says the former president should be prosecuted because it was the modus operandi of such attacks to massacre everyone in the targeted house, as happened in similar raids on in Zimbabwe and Mozambique.
"De Klerk killed my children. They were innocent. They were not [PAC] forces," he said.
Ten years ago, de Klerk appeared before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to apologize for apartheid and the crimes committed in defense of white rule but to deny any personal knowledge or responsibility.
He grew increasingly agitated under questioning by TRC lawyers sceptical of his attempts to distance himself from the killings.
"It's untenable that a Cabinet minister who sat in the State Security Council [SSC] meetings from 1985 to 1989 claims that he was unaware that gross human rights violations were being committed on an ongoing basis," said Howard Varney, a TRC investigator.
"Aside from the fact that plainly unlawful programs were being considered by the SSC meetings he attended, he would have been aware that the security forces were running amok on the ground. He took no steps to voice objections or distance himself or to restrain them in any way," Varney said.
CONFRONTATION: The water cannon attack was the second this month on the Philippine supply boat ‘Unaizah May 4,’ after an incident on March 5 The China Coast Guard yesterday morning blocked a Philippine supply vessel and damaged it with water cannons near a reef off the Southeast Asian country, the Philippines said. The Philippine military released video of what it said was a nearly hour-long attack off the Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙) in the contested South China Sea, where Chinese ships have unleashed water cannons and collided with Philippine vessels in similar standoffs in the past few months. The China Coast Guard and other vessels “once again harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers” against a routine rotation and resupply mission to
GLOBAL COMBAT AIR PROGRAM: The potential purchasers would be limited to the 15 nations with which Tokyo has signed defense partnership and equipment transfer deals Japan’s Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to sell future next-generation fighter jets that it is developing with the UK and Italy to other nations, in the latest move away from the country’s post-World War II pacifist principles. The contentious decision to allow international arms sales is expected to help secure Japan’s role in the joint fighter jet project, and is part of a move to build up the Japanese arms industry and bolster its role in global security. The Cabinet also endorsed a revision to Japan’s arms equipment and technology transfer guidelines to allow coproduced lethal weapons to be sold to nations
‘POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE’: Leo Varadkar said he was ‘no longer the best person’ to lead the nation and was stepping down for political, as well as personal, reasons Leo Varadkar on Wednesday announced that he was stepping down as Ireland’s prime minister and leader of the Fine Gael party in the governing coalition, citing “personal and political” reasons. Pundits called the surprise move, just 10 weeks before Ireland holds European Parliament and local elections, a “political earthquake.” A general election has to be held within a year. Irish Deputy Prime Minister Micheal Martin, leader of Fianna Fail, the main coalition partner, said Varadkar’s announcement was “unexpected,” but added that he expected the government to run its full term. An emotional Varadkar, who is in his second stint as prime minister and at
Thousands of devotees, some in a state of trance, gathered at a Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Bangkok renowned for sacred tattoos known as Sak Yant, paying their respects to a revered monk who mastered the practice and seeking purification. The gathering at Wat Bang Phra Buddhist temple is part of a Thai Wai Khru ritual in which devotees pay homage to Luang Phor Pern, the temple’s formal abbot, who died in 2002. He had a reputation for refining and popularizing the temple’s Sak Yant tattoo style. The idea that tattoos confer magical powers has existed in many parts of Asia