US President George W. Bush once said he was determined to stick with the Iraq war even if his wife and his dog were the only ones left at his side.
It is moving in that direction.
People in the US already were angry about the war before Bush said he would try to bring unrelentingly violent Iraq back from the brink by adding 21,500 more US troops to the 132,000 there now.
Polls showed the US public overwhelmingly does not like the idea. Democrats, always in opposition, were joined very publicly by some Republicans in dissent. Even Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had to be persuaded to go along with a larger US presence in Baghdad.
"He is as isolated as a president can be," said Julian Zelizer, a political historian at Boston University.
Congress, which is now controled by the Democrats, is poised to produce votes against a policy that, although nonbinding, will reverberate into elections next year.
And Bush's problem with Washington's politicians is not only the product of the new partisan divide.
Democrats who backed the president on the war are jumping ship. The din of disapproval is heard even among some conservative Republicans. The time when only a few Republican lawmakers gingerly would criticize the president's leadership on the war has given way to the kind of no-holds-barred rhetoric heard the day after Bush's speech on Wednesday night.
Republican representative John McCain, one of the holdouts on Bush's side who wants more troops, acknowledged it was anyone's guess whether most Republicans will back the president when the votes are called.
"I hope the overwhelming majority of my Republican colleagues will come on board, but I can't predict that," he said.
Bush treated Republican leaders from the House and Senate to an overnight at Camp David to work on strategy on keeping party members in line after a week of defections that ranged well beyond Iraq.
The politicians are following the public. Seventy percent of those questioned oppose sending more troops to Iraq and doubt that doing so will help, an AP-Ipsos poll showed. Approval of the president's handling of the war now stands at 29 percent.
Bush's aides took pains to portray the war plan as in line with the thinking of both his generals and the bipartisan Iraq Study Group.
But the president ignored that group's central recommendations: pulling US troops back by next year, changing their mission and recruiting help from Iran and Syria.
The group publicly thanked Bush for paying attention to some of their ideas -- such as embedding more US trainers with Iraqi security forces and setting benchmarks -- but made clear they noticed all the ways the president had spurned them.
War commanders feared a troop increase would strain the armed forces while reducing incentives for Iraqis to take over for themselves. So they had to be brought around.
They received assurances Bush would couple the buildup with significant economic aid and demands that the Iraqis make difficult political and tactical changes.
But the president attached no consequences if al-Maliki fails -- as he has in the past -- to deliver.
Even al-Maliki, on whom nearly all the plan's success hinges, is at best a reluctant partner.
The White House repeatedly said the plan to send thousands more US troops into Baghdad originated with the Iraqi leader. But what al-Maliki proposed was an Iraqi drive to calm the capital with US soldiers pulled back to the outskirts of Baghdad. The US rejected this idea for fear it would lead to unequal treatment of Shiites and Sunnis.
Bush's isolation recalls Lyndon Johnson predicament when opposition to the Vietnam War convinced him that he should not run for re-election.
Likewise, Zelizer said the now-open revolt of increasing numbers in Bush's own party could be "very dangerous" for the president.
It makes it much more difficult for Bush to get support during the final two years of his presidency, increases the likelihood his policies will be seen by history as a mistake and puts his party in a very difficult position leading up to next year, Zelizer said.
Bush believes that the "long march of history" will prove him right and is content to stand alone, if he must, until that day.
He is so sure of eventual success in Iraq that he once told some leading Republicans: "I will not withdraw even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me," referring to the first lady and his Scottish terrier, Bob Woodward's recent book, State of Denial, says.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese
‘IN A DIFFERENT PLACE’: The envoy first visited Shanghai, where he attended a Chinese basketball playoff match, and is to meet top officials in Beijing tomorrow US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday arrived in China on his second visit in a year as the US ramps up pressure on its rival over its support for Russia while also seeking to manage tensions with Beijing. The US diplomat tomorrow is to meet China’s top brass in Beijing, where he is also expected to plead for restraint as Taiwan inaugurates president-elect William Lai (賴清德), and to raise US concerns on Chinese trade practices. However, Blinken is also seeking to stabilize ties, with tensions between the world’s two largest economies easing since his previous visit in June last year. At the