Wed, Mar 08, 2006 - Page 7 News List

More US women now opting for children over careers

AFP , WASHINGTON

More and more US women are swapping briefcases and suits for jeans and diaper bags as they opt to stay home and raise children, putting the brakes on decades of female advances in the workplace.

For the first time in the post-feminist era, the number of working women has begun to retreat, with even graduates from prestigious universities giving up promising careers for old-fashioned domesticity.

A new magazine launched in California has seized on the trend: the cover of Total 180 shows a slender, radiant woman balancing her daughter on one hip as she tosses her briefcase into the trash.

"With practical information that validates, supports and reassures their lifestyle, Total 180 is the sustenance for professional women turned stay-at-home moms," the magazine's Web site says.

Some 6 million women have chosen to leave the workforce to stay home and raise their children, said the magazine's chief editor, Erika Kotite.

But they feel isolated, she said, and the magazine aims to address their needs "with humor and lightheartedness."

But not everyone sees this positively, especially feminists who fought decades ago to open workplace doors to women.

Rose Olver, a professor of women's studies at Amherst College in Massachusetts, called the trend "somewhat alarming."

"Women in the 1970s fought for access and my sense is that the urgency to open the work place to women has subsided," Olver said.

"Opportunities open for women may decrease" in the future if more women drop out, she said.

"The older generation feel may be a bit put out that this generation is so cavalierly assuming that these possibilities will be open to them," she said.

"The child-rearing issue is much thornier than many feminists thought it would be," said professor Linda Fowler of Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.

"What feminist theorists thought was that, if enough women were in the workplace in high-scale and highly qualified jobs, the whole workplace economy would be more humanized. That has not happened," Fowler said.

"There is still a difference on obstacles women face as they are trying to juggle a career and family," she said.

But behind the debate of whether the trend is good or bad is a broader stagnation or even decline in women holding jobs in the US workplace after rising for 50 years straight.

"The new factor at play is the change in the trend in the female participation rate, which has edged down on balance since 2000 after having risen for five decades," a White House report said last month.

In 2000, 77 percent of women between 25 and 54 held a job in the US. By last year, the level had dropped to 75 percent, a significant demographic shift.

How much the data represents voluntary workplace dropouts by women and how much they are forced is still debated.

Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization of Women, which helped promote working women from the 1960s, said the decline of women in the US workforce reflects in part simple economics: the fall in overall jobs since the US economy slowed sharply in 2000.

However, she said that other factors, like wages and the cost of childcare, impact working women much more than men.

"When good jobs are plentiful, it becomes easier to cover the cost of child care with your wages," she said.

"When wages are depressed ... it becomes a much closer question as to whether it's worth a tradeoff," she said.

This story has been viewed 1810 times.
TOP top