With a campaign of high-profile national security events set for the next three days, following Karl Rove's blistering speech to national Republicans on Friday, the White House has effectively declared that it views its controversial secret surveillance program not as a political liability but as an asset.
But as the White House and Democrats are well aware, the issue can draw very different reactions, depending on how it is presented.
Americans may be willing to support extraordinary measures -- perhaps extralegal ones -- if it they are posed in terms of protecting the nation from another calamitous attack.
They are less likely to be supportive, members of both parties said, if the question is presented as a president breaking the law to spy on the nation's own citizens.
The speech by Rove, the president's chief political adviser, on Friday to the Republican National Committee set out the administration's argument.
"President [George W.] Bush believes if al-Qaeda is calling somebody in America, it is in our national security interest to know who they're calling and why," Rove asserted. "Some important Democrats clearly disagree."
Democrats -- and, though Rove made no mention of this on Friday, some Republicans, too -- have indeed challenged the administration for eavesdropping without obtaining a warrant.
Yet it is difficult to think of a Democrat who has actually argued that it is not "in our national security interest" to track al-Qaeda calls to the US, as Rove contended.
This week the White House's campaign was due to feature a speech yesterday by Lieutenant General Michael Hayden, the former head of the National Security Agency; a legal defense of the program by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales today; and a visit by Bush to NSA headquarters tomorrow.
Still, a number of Republicans have joined Democrats in challenging the White House surveillance program.
Republican Senator Arlen Specter, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, is holding hearings on the surveillance program. And in an interview on Sunday, Senator John McCain, a Republican, said he did not think the president had the legal authority for this operation.
McCain also came to the defense of Democrats in response to Rove's suggestion that they were not committed to the nation's security.
"Do I think that the president's leadership has been worthy of support of our party and our leadership? Yes," he said.
"But there's too many good Democrats over there who are as concerned about national security and work just as hard as I do," McCain said.
Beyond that, one Republican analyst who is dubious about the White House strategy said Bush's position was hardly helped by the fact that his credibility numbers have dropped along with his popularity since the election.
Bush may find, as some Democrats have suggested, that the invocations of Sept. 11 do not have the force they once had.
Far from the violence ravaging Haiti, a market on the border with the Dominican Republic has maintained a welcome degree of normal everyday life. At the Dajabon border gate, a wave of Haitians press forward, eager to shop at the twice-weekly market about 200km from Haiti’s capital, Port-au-Prince. They are drawn by the market’s offerings — food, clothing, toys and even used appliances — items not always readily available in Haiti. However, with gang violence bad and growing ever worse in Haiti, the Dominican government has reinforced the usual military presence at the border and placed soldiers on alert. While the market continues to
An image of a dancer balancing on the words “China Before Communism” looms over Parisian commuters catching the morning metro, signaling the annual return of Shen Yun, a controversial spectacle of traditional Chinese dance mixed with vehement criticism of Beijing and conservative rhetoric. The Shen Yun Performing Arts company has slipped the beliefs of a spiritual movement called Falun Gong in between its technicolored visuals and leaping dancers since 2006, with advertising for the show so ubiquitous that it has become an Internet meme. Founded in 1992, Falun Gong claims nearly 100 million followers and has been subject to “persistent persecution” in
ONLINE VITRIOL: While Mo Yan faces a lawsuit, bottled water company Nongfu Spring and Tsinghua University are being attacked amid a rise in nationalist fervor At first glance, a Nobel prize winning author, a bottle of green tea and Beijing’s Tsinghua University have little in common, but in recent weeks they have been dubbed by China’s nationalist netizens as the “three new evils” in the fight to defend the country’s valor in cyberspace. Last month, a patriotic blogger called Wu Wanzheng filed a lawsuit against China’s only Nobel prize-winning author, Mo Yan (莫言), accusing him of discrediting the Communist army and glorifying Japanese soldiers in his fictional works set during the Japanese invasion of China. Wu, who posts online under the pseudonym “Truth-Telling Mao Xinghuo,” is seeking
‘SURPRISES’: The militants claim to have successfully tested a missile capable of reaching Mach 8 and vowed to strike ships heading toward the Cape of Good Hope Yemen’s Houthi rebels claim to have a new, hypersonic missile in their arsenal, Russia’s state media reported on Thursday, potentially raising the stakes in their attacks on shipping in the Red Sea and surrounding waterways against the backdrop of Israel’s war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The report by the state-run RIA Novosti news agency cited an unidentified official, but provided no evidence for the claim. It comes as Moscow maintains an aggressively counter-Western foreign policy amid its grinding war on Ukraine. However, the Houthis have for weeks hinted about “surprises” they plan for the battles at sea to counter the