Print

Mail

wiki links

MPs looking for answers about CIA terror flights

British members of parliament (MPs) stepped up pressure on ministers on Monday to disclose details of CIA aircraft using British airfields amid reports that they have transported individuals to foreign countries where they are likely to be tortured.

Ministers are refusing to reveal any information about the "extraordinary rendition" flights despite evidence, including details of the flights, revealed in September. Extraordinary rendition is the practice of transferring individuals to a foreign country where they are more likely to be subjected to torture or inhumane treatment.

Evidence

Ministers have shed no further light on the issue, despite a series of questions tabled by MPs, notably the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, Sir Menzies Campbell. There is evidence that a CIA Gulfstream and Boeing 737 aircraft have landed at military airfields, including RAF Northolt, west London.

Minister of Defense Adam Ingram has told Sir Menzies: "Where passengers do not leave the airfield, the MoD [Ministry of Defense] ... does not record details of passengers."

But he adds that the ministry maintains a record of all civil registered aircraft -- such as the CIA planes -- landing at military airfields.

Policy

"The British government appears to be adopting a hear no evil, see no evil policy towards this issue," Sir Menzies said on Monday.

"In the light of the allegations that British airports are being used as staging posts for rendition, the government should instigate an immediate investigation," he said.

Andrew Tyrie, a Conservative MP, who is setting up a cross-party backbench committee with Sir Menzies and the former Labour Foreign Office minister Chris Mullin to investigate the allegations, said: "It is morally repugnant that any country could be involved in this foul practice."

Elizabeth Wilmshurst, the deputy Foreign Office legal adviser who resigned in protest against the invasion of Iraq, said: "If the reports are true and the UK was actively assisting, then it would be responsible under the law."
This story has been viewed 1354 times.