Well-heeled consultants and companies in the West are the beneficiaries of a global-aid system which results in less than 40 percent of cash donations helping to eradicate poverty in the developing world, according to a report yesterday.
Just over a month before Britain will make a doubling of aid a centerpiece of the Gleneagles summit, the charity ActionAid said the bulk of the money currently allocated was wasted, misdirected or recycled within rich countries.
It found that 61 percent of aid flows were "phantom" rather than "real" -- rising to almost 90 percent in the case of France and the US.
The report accused rich countries of "political grandstanding" and highlighted the ways in which they were disguising how real aid flows were even lower than they appeared to be.
"Failure to target aid at the poorest countries, runaway spending on overpriced technical assistance from international consultants, tying aid to purchases from donor countries' own firms, cumbersome and ill-coordinated planning, implementation, monitoring and reporting requirements, excessive administrative costs, late and partial disbursements, double counting of debt relief, and aid spending on immigration services all deflate the value of aid," it said.
Compared with a UN target of spending 0.7 percent, rich countries were ostensibly spending 0.25 percent of their national income on aid each year.
The figure came down to 0.1 percent when "phantom" aid was stripped out.
The G7 countries -- Britain, the US, Germany, Italy, France, Canada and Japan -- spent only 0.07 percent of national income on real aid and would need a tenfold increase to hit the UN target, ActionAid said.
Britain, according to the research, is a better-performing country, but still allows 29 percent of the money spent by its Department for International Development (DfID) to be squandered on "phantom" aid. The UK was spending 0.24 percent of gross domestic product on "real" aid in 2003.
The report quotes a DfID official as saying that foreign experts giving technical advice in Vietnam, for example, are paid US$18,000 to US$27,000 a month, compared with US$1,500 to US$3,000 for local experts.
DfID rejected the findings.
"It's simply nonsense to suggest that a third of UK aid is `phantom,'" international development secretary Hilary Benn said. "ActionAid's figures just don't stack up. It's absurd to argue that debt relief, or practical advice from technical experts, isn't real aid."
He did, however, accept that there was a need for more and better aid and said the UK was working with other donors to avoid duplication and waste.
ActionAid said the report did not invalidate the need for more financial assistance, saying that where aid was delivered it was helping to tackle poverty.
It called for a new international agreement that would see money spent where it was needed rather than on business-class flights for Western consultants. It said three-quarters of the money spent on technical assistance was wasted on inflated salaries for consultants flown in to advise poor countries.
The authors of the report, Romilly Greenhill and Patrick Watt, said their figures were not precise because of the paucity of data.
They added, however, that they had tended to be generous to donors and that the true scale of the challenge might be even greater than that highlighted.
To arrive at their figures, they deflated the value of official aid to take account of donor practices that reduced its effectiveness.
The charity said its proposal for an international aid agreement run by the UN would make aid more accountable. An agreement should involve clear policies on criteria for accepting aid, mutual commitments in place of one-sided conditionality, national and international forums where donors and recipients would review progress on an equal footing, and new mechanisms to increase substantially the volume and predictability of aid.
The report adds: "Donors have signed up to numerous international agreements to improve the quality of their aid. Yet this agenda has made little headway. At the heart of this failure there lies a lack of accountability on the part of donors for either the amount of aid they commit, or the quality of that aid."
Donors, it said, continued to restrict the ability of developing countries "to plot their own development paths."
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was