Prime Minister Paul Martin on Monday scrambled to prevent the downfall of his government amid a kickback scandal in his Liberal Party, as a new poll indicates the opposition Conservative Party would easily win fresh elections if held today.
In what some say have called Canada's version of the Watergate scandal, Martin reiterated he had nothing to do with the ethics fiasco, in which party members are accused of having taken kickbacks from Liberal-friendly agencies hired to promote national unity in the French-speaking province of Quebec, where separatism is popular.
"Not only do I have the moral authority, I have the moral responsibility" to keep the government afloat until the full inquiry into the scandal concludes in the fall, Martin said.
"Canadians are entitled to ask someone to step forward and I'm the prime minister of this country," he said. "I can assure you that anyone who has been implicated is going to be punished."
How long Martin can remain prime minister is anyone's guess and the halls of parliament were rife with speculation about whether new elections were around the corner.
The separatist Bloc Quebecois could introduce a confidence motion by tomorrow, though the more powerful Conservative Party was hedging, knowing most Canadians are not keen for new elections. Parliamentary elections were just held last June.
"There is a depth of anger there. The Liberal Party is in deep, deep trouble," said Richard Simeon, professor of political science at the University of Toronto.
A poll published on Monday by the Toronto Star indicates that only 25 percent of those questioned last week would vote for the Liberals if there were elections held today. The Conservatives were backed by 36 percent, up 10 points from a survey taken in February.
The poll, conducted by EKOS Research Associates, surveyed 1,125 Canadians over voting age between last Thursday and Saturday, with a 2.9 percent margin of error.
However, the poll also indicated 62 percent of Canadians do not want new elections, despite their disgust over the secret fund for federalism.
The scandal, based on a secret program that dates back to the 1990s and the Liberal Party leadership of former prime minister Jean Chretien, erupted anew last Thursday when a judge probing the alleged misuse of public funds lifted a publication ban on testimony by Montreal ad executive Jean Brault.
Brault, who faces fraud charges stemming from the now-defunct program, told the federal inquiry that senior Liberals forced him to secretly divert more than C$1 million (US$818,000) to the party's Quebec wing in exchange for sponsorship contracts.
During his six days of testimony, Brault told of hushed-up payments to Liberals in restaurants, money given to a brother of Chretien, and reluctant contributions strong-armed out of employees.
Brault said he got C$172 million, in government business for his firm.
Chretien and Martin have vehemently denied any personal knowledge of wrongdoing.
The so-called "sponsorship scandal" outraged the public when it was uncovered in 2002, after the auditor general determined that C$100 million from a C$250 million national unity fund went to Liberal-friendly advertising firms. Public anger over the secret fund contributed to the Liberal Party's loss of its majority in Parliament in last year's election.



