US President George W. Bush has launched into his second term with lofty declarations on freedom and liberty, but his recent inaugural address left many foreign capitals trying to decipher what exactly this heralds for the world. \nAnd analysts said the details of the president's declarations, which extended to domestic reforms, remain woolly. \nAt his inauguration last Thursday, Bush emphasized that the global fight against tyranny will be a core principle of US foreign policy. \nAnd in a White House press conference on Wednesday, he stressed his plan to reform the vast US Social Security system would also be a key goal during his second four-year term. \nBut the lack of concrete details on how such lofty goals will be achieved has left many diplomats in foreign capitals, as well as lawmakers in the halls of the US Congress, mulling over Bush's words. \nPart of Bush's Jan. 20 inauguration speech, for example, together with frank comments made the same morning by Vice President Dick Cheney, were understood in many countries as a direct threat of military action against Iran. \nBush did not make himself much clearer on Wednesday, when he insisted simply that: "My inaugural address reflected the policies of the past four years that we are implementing in Afghanistan and Iraq." \nEven seasoned political analysts are scratching their heads. \n"The language of the inaugural address was very robust," said Stephen Hess, an expert on presidential history at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. \n"But also there is not really any other thing in the world like an American presidential inaugural address, which is basically a statement of principle," Hess explained. \n"Other nations which probably have not paid that much attention to this form have truly not understood it, and have spent an awful lot of the last week trying to analyze what it possibly meant in policy terms," he said. \nSince his reelection, Bush has also repeatedly stated he would take advantage of the "political capital" accumulated in his victory to launch sweeping reforms of tax and Social Security programs. \nBut again, the White House has provided few details on how this will be achieved. \n"The president says nice words, but there is little follow-up," said Howard Dean, who last year ran unsuccessfully for the Democratic presidential nomination and now hopes to win the leadership of the Democratic Party. \nBush, who has said that Social Security must be reformed before the system goes bankrupt, acknowledged on Wednesday that the issue is highly explosive. \n"Social security has been an issue that has made people nervous. People felt like it was the third rail of American politics. That means if you touch it, it will be political death," Bush said. \nOpposition Democrats have countered that the Republican president is creating a climate of crisis around the Social Security system in order to force reform. The system is in fact solvent at least until 2042, the Democrats argue. \nWhen it comes to details, though, Bush has confined himself to expressing opposition to any increase in salary deductions for Social Security, which some economists say would ensure the system's long-term stability. \nInstead, Bush supports diverting some of the deductions to private retirement savings accounts for younger workers. \nThe lack of details in the president's plans has not stopped Republicans and Democrats from lining up for the political battles to come. On Social Security, some Republicans have made known their own opposition to the president's plans. \n"Ultimately, he will have to present far more details that he has now. Because the devil is in the details," Hess said. \nBush will have the platform to spell out his ideas more clearly to the US public when he delivers the annual State of the Union address on Feb. 2 to the US Congress. \nBut on Wednesday, he again reminded that his approach, announcing big ideas and letting Congress sort out the details, proved successful when he put through sweeping tax cuts during his first term.
TARNISHED LEGACY: Woodrow Wilson served as the university’s president before becoming the US’ 28th leader, but his racism was ‘significant and consequential’ Princeton University is removing former US president Woodrow Wilson’s name from its public policy school and one of its residential colleges after trustees concluded that the 28th president’s “racist thinking and policies” made him “an inappropriate namesake.” The Ivy League school’s trustees made the decision on Friday, according to a statement on Saturday. It comes at a time of widespread rethinking of the US’ racial legacy. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, energized by a series of high-profile deaths of black Americans, has resulted in the removal of Confederate monuments, flags and symbols of racism across the US. Deleting Wilson’s name at Princeton
‘FULLY ENCLOSED’: Residents of Anxin County would be confined to their homes and would only be allowed out once a day to buy necessities such as food and medicine China yesterday imposed a strict lockdown on nearly half a million people near the capital to contain a fresh COVID-19 cluster as authorities warned the outbreak was still “severe and complicated.” After China largely brought the virus under control, hundreds have been infected in Beijing and cases have emerged in Hebei Province. Health officials said that Anxin County — about 150km from Beijing — would be “fully enclosed and controlled,” the same strict measures imposed at the height of the pandemic in the city of Wuhan earlier this year. Only one person from each family would be allowed to go out once a
Japan said it opposed changes to the G7 nations as it pushed back against a reform plan by US President Donald Trump that would have rival South Korea this year join in an expanded meeting. Tokyo has told the US it stands against South Korea’s participation on the grounds of differences in policy on China and North Korea, Kyodo News reported this weekend, citing more than one source related to Japanese and US diplomacy. Japan also wants to maintain its status as the only Asian country in the group, the news agency added. Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga yesterday told reporters that
The onset of summer has sparked a rise in incidents of “mask rage” in South Korea as more hot and bothered commuters either refuse to wear face coverings or leave parts of their faces exposed. In South Korea, Japan and other countries in East Asia, widespread mask wearing has been cited as one possible explanation for the region’s relative success in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic under control. South Korea, one of the first countries outside China to be affected by the virus, flattened the coronavirus curve in April, although it is now struggling with dozens of daily cases, mainly in and around