Authorities confirmed on Tuesday another case of mad cow disease in the western province of Alberta -- the second animal found to have the deadly brain-wasting disease in Canada since US officials announced last month they would resume the cross-border cattle trade in March. \nCanadian officials said no part of the cow -- the third case of the disease ever found in Canada -- had entered the human or animal feed system. \nBut the announcement may strengthen the position of a group of US cattlemen who have sued to block the lifting of the ban. The cattlemen say allowing the trade will hurt US producers and put consumers at risk. \nUS Department of Agriculture officials said on Tuesday they are sending a team to Canada to evaluate the latest mad cow case before deciding whether to change their plan to resume imports. \nRon DeHaven, administrator of the Agriculture Department's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, said the agency is confident that protections in place in Canada and the US will safeguard US consumers and livestock. \nThe latest case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was discovered in an animal under seven years old. Canadian Minister of Agriculture Andy Mitchell said the case was unrelated to the second case of the disease, which was confirmed Jan. 2 and also involved an Alberta cow. \n"A third case of BSE in a cow in Canada has been confirmed today through our surveillance system," Mitchell said in a news conference in Ottawa, the nation's capital. "This is not unexpected, as we have already acknowledged that there is a low level of incidence of BSE in North America." \nThe latest sick cow was born after a 1997 feed ban in Canada removed the use of animal remains in feed, commonly believed to be the cause of the disease. This makes the case of this third Canadian cow with BSE more serious than the others because the cause could be much more difficult to trace. \nHowever, Dr Brian Evans of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency said the cow was most likely exposed to feed before the ban came into effect in the fall of 1997 and that his agency was investigating. \nNevertheless, Mitchell stressed the new case was not a cause for alarm. \n"The rules upon which beef should move between countries should be based on science, and we believe that Canada has clearly followed a scientific approach," he said. \nMitchell pledged that Canada would toughen measures to stem the disease and that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, with an independent third party, would conduct an audit of the country's animal feed safety. \nThe Jan. 2 case was announced after the disease was detected in an 8-year-old cow from Alberta. It was born in the same herd -- within one year -- of a cow shipped to the US in February 2002 for immediate slaughter, the USDA said. \nCanada's first case of mad cow surfaced in May 2003, prompting the US government to close the border to Canadian beef imports. Concerns persisted after a Canadian-born cow in Washington state was found in December 2003 to have the disease, which attacks the animal's nervous system. \nAll three cases have involved animals from Alberta. \nOn Dec. 29, the Bush administration announced plans for lifting the ban. \nAfter learning of the second case days later, the administration had said it would stand by its decision, expressing confidence that public health measures in both countries will protect US livestock and consumers.
Henry Tong (湯偉雄) and Elaine To (杜依蘭) were preparing to spend their first wedding anniversary in separate prison cells until their acquittal for rioting during Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protests. There were gasps and tears of relief in court on Friday last week as a judge declared prosecutors had failed to prove that the couple took part in clashes with police in July last year. The pair walked free in a ruling that has potential consequences for hundreds of other protesters facing similar charges. However, they have a long journey ahead as they try to rebuild their lives and business. “We have already been punished,”
WARNINGS OVER COMPLACENCY: The curves of new infections in numerous countries is climbing, while others see the the first new infections in months Spikes in COVID-19 infections in Asia have dispelled any notion that the region might be over the worst, with Australia and India yesterday reporting record daily infections, Vietnam fretting over a new surge and North Korea urging vigilance. Asian nations had largely prided themselves on rapidly containing initial outbreaks after the coronavirus emerged in central China late last year, but flare-ups this month have shown the danger of complacency. “We’ve got to be careful not to slip into some idea that there’s some golden immunity that Australia has in relation to this virus,” Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison told reporters. Australia recorded its
‘COVIDIOTS’: Politicians condemned the protest that came amid surging infections in the country, while a marcher said government-induced fear weakened the body Loudly chanting their opposition to masks and vaccines, thousands of people on Saturday gathered in Berlin to protest against COVID-19 restrictions before being dispersed by police. Police put turnout at about 20,000 — well below the 500,000 organizers had announced as they urged a “day of freedom” from months of virus curbs. Despite Germany’s comparatively low toll, authorities are concerned at a rise in infections over the past few weeks and politicians took to social media to criticize the rally as irresponsible. “We are the second wave,” shouted the crowd, a mixture of hard left and right and conspiracy theorists, as they converged
The Australian government yesterday said that it plans to give Google and Facebook three months to negotiate with media businesses fair pay for news content. In releasing a draft of a mandatory code of conduct, Canberra aims to succeed where other nations have failed in making tech firms pay for news siphoned from commercial media companies. Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said that Google and Facebook would be the first platforms targeted by the proposed legislation, but others could follow. “It’s about a fair go for Australian news media businesses, it’s about ensuring that we have increased competition, increased consumer protection and a sustainable