Thu, Sep 23, 2004 - Page 7 News List

Reliability of polls called into question


A poll in 20 swing states published on Tuesday showed Senator John Kerry still clinging to a narrow lead over President George W. Bush in the key election battlegrounds, but it raised questions about the reliability of such polls at a volatile point in the campaign.

While some other surveys have shown the election as a tight race, a string of recent polls has given the president a double-digit lead, provoking controversy about the various techniques used by the survey groups.

Tuesday's poll by Zogby International suggested that although Kerry was losing ground, his support was better distributed in the battleground states, giving him a potential edge in the electoral college, which reflects the way each state votes and ultimately selects the president.

If the election were held today, according to Zogby, Kerry would have 264 votes in the electoral college, six short of the number needed to win, and the president would have 241 votes.

Florida, which accounts for 27 votes, and Arkansas, with six votes, would be tied.

This is a significant erosion of Kerry's margin since the last Zogby poll two weeks ago, when he had a 51-vote lead in the electoral college.

But it contrasts dramatically with the the latest national poll by Gallup, published last week, which gave Bush a 14-point lead over Kerry in a three-way race with Ralph Nader, the left-wing independent candidate, who drew 3 percent support.

That in turn differed sharply from another national survey last week by an equally respected body, the Pew Research Centre in Washington, which gave Bush a single-point lead.

Some experts have pointed to differences in methodology. All three polls asked the preferences of likely voters, but each used a different questionnaire to determine who counted as a likely voter.

More controversially, Zogby International weights its results according to party identification, adjusting them so that the proportion of its sample that identifies with each party conforms to the population as a whole.

Other polling organizations adjust for height, race, and gender, but argue vehemently against weighting by party identification, saying that it is subject to change.

John Zogby, the head of Zogby International, disagrees, arguing that party identification changes only glacially and that the unusually high number of Republicans in the Gallup sample suggested it was skewed.

The polls do agree on one overall trend though: Bush enjoyed a surge of support after the Republican convention, and has held on to some of that momentum.

An average of the polls of the past few weeks gives Bush a six percentage point lead.

Almost all the polls show a significant erosion of support for Kerry in a key Democratic constituency: women.

In 2000 Al Gore would have beaten Bush by 11 points if the only voters had been women. Kerry's advantage is now much slimmer, and some polls have even shown Bush winning the female vote.

This story has been viewed 3137 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top