Wed, Sep 15, 2004 News Editorials 585153325 visits
 Photo News
 More World News
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
 
 Community Compass
 
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    CBS still taking heat on Bush service story

    DEFENSIVE CROUCH: As `experts' bicker about whether key documents could have been produced by a 1970s typewriter, the network continues to stand by its report

    NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE, NEW YORK
    Wednesday, Sep 15, 2004, Page 7

    "I've talked to colleagues who would love to see more of a defense."

    An unnamed CBS correspondent

    When the CBS News anchor Dan Rather defended himself on camera and in interviews last Friday against questions that were being raised about documents he had used to bolster a report on President George W. Bush's National Guard service, he and network executives considered the case closed.

    Rather himself said emphatically: "CBS News stands by, and I stand by, the thoroughness and accuracy of this report, period. Our story is true."

    Yet there he was again, on CBS Evening News on Monday night, presenting even more experts to attest to the authenticity of several documents purportedly dating back to the early 1970s suggesting that Bush received favorable treatment in the Guard.

    While Rather's initial 60 Min-utes report was considered a journalistic coup, coming in the peak of an election year and in the twilight of Rather's career, the network has found itself under unrelenting pressure from within and without to prove that the documents were genuine amid charges that they could only have been produced by modern-day word processors.

    The controversy over the documents has been propelled by a volatile mix of fierce election-year rancor, daily disclosures pointing to potential weaknesses in CBS' report and the network's steadfast refusal to explain how it got the documents.

    Even inside CBS News there was deepening concern. Some of Rather's colleagues said in interviews that they were becoming increasingly anxious for him to silence the critics by proving the documents' validity and as new questions about their origin arose. Most declined to be quoted by name.

    CBS said the documents came from the personal files of one of Bush's Guard commanders, Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian.

    The memorandums indicated that Bush had failed to take a physical as ordered and that Killian was being pressured to "sugarcoat" his performance rating because Bush, whose father was then a Texas congressman, was "talking to somebody upstairs."

    One of the experts CBS News said initially helped convince it that the documents were genuine, a handwriting expert named Marcel Matley, said in an interview on Monday that he believed the signature in the documents to be that of Killian.

    Asked if the signature could have been lifted from an official document by Killian and pasted onto forgeries, Matley said: "Sure. But we can't draw a conclusion from a possibility."

    Several CBS correspondents said in interviews that such developments were making them increasingly nervous.

    One correspondent said, "I've talked to colleagues who would love to see more of a defense."

    On Monday night, CBS featured computer and typewriter specialists who had called or posted defenses of CBS on Internet blogs.

    Richard Katz, a computer software expert in Los Angeles who was featured on the Evening News segment, said that he had called his local affiliate, KCBS, after looking at the memos on the CBS Web site after the initial broadcast.

    Comparing the CBS memos with a replication produced on Microsoft Word, Katz noticed a slight variation in the boldness of the letters -- as there appears on many typewritten documents.

    "It doesn't look like you can do this very easily," he said. "If you use something like Photoshop you could come close to faking it, but why not just go out and buy a Selectric for US$75?"

    Bill Glennon, a technology consultant and IBM typewriter specialist, said CBS called him Monday morning.

    The producer asked him to come in and look at the memorandums and say whether he thought that an IBM typewriter could have produced the documents. He said he was initially leery of talking.

    "Because quite honestly there's some people out there, they're scary," he said. "You don't agree with them, you offer opinions that don't jibe with theirs and you get a target on your back."

    Glennon was in charge of service for 1,000 contracts for IBM typewriters for 15 years, starting in late 1972, around the time the memorandums were produced.

    He spent 15 minutes with the CBS documents, he said, and believes that they could have been created using the kind of typewriters he worked with at IBM.
    This story has been viewed 4961 times.

  • Advertising