Fri, Jul 16, 2004 - Page 7 News List

Senate votes down ban on gay marriages

AP , Washington

The US Senate scuttled a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, handing a defeat to President George W. Bush yet assuring the issue renewed prominence in the fall campaign for the White House and control of Congress.

Forty-eight senators voted to advance the measure on Wednesday -- 12 short of the 60 needed -- and 50 voted to block it. Defeat came at the hands of dozens of Democrats joined by six Republicans.

Bush issued a statement saying he was "deeply disappointed" with the vote, but casting it as a temporary setback. "Activist judges and local officials in some parts of the country are not letting up in their efforts to redefine marriage for the rest of America -- and neither should defenders of traditional marriage flag in their efforts," he said.

Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle said there was no urgent need to amend the Constitution.

"In South Dakota, we've never had a single same sex marriage and we won't have any," the said shortly before the vote. "It's prohibited by South Dakota law as it is now in 38 other states. There is no confusion. There is no ambiguity."

The amendment provided that marriage within the US "shall consist only of a man and a woman.'' It also required that neither the US Constitution nor any state constitution ``shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman."

The Senate acted as House Republicans began advancing legislation that would bar federal courts from ordering states to recognize same-sex marriages sanctioned in other states. The measure cleared committee on a vote of 21-13 and is expected on the House floor next week.

Republican leaders also have discussed granting Bush his wish to have the entire House vote on the proposed constitutional amendment in the fall, even though the Senate's rejection effectively killed any chance it could be submitted to the states for ratification this year.

Whatever the legislative endgame, supporters said they expected the issue to play a role in political campaigns.

"I think it will be a significant issue in the fall elections as it is further engaged," said Senator Sam Brownback, a Republican.

"Four million religious conservative voters sat out the last election, so the president's visible stance on protecting marriage is essential to turning out all of those conservative voters who pulled the lever for him in 2000 and getting those other 4 million to come out for him this year," said Keith Appell, a conservative strategist in Washington.

"We now know which senators are for traditional marriage and which ones are not, and by November, so will voters in every state," promised Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, which supports the amendment.

He said nine states are poised to have state constitutional amendments on their ballots this fall on marriage, adding, "This fight has just begun."

Cheryl Jacques, president of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights organization, professed a lack of concern.

"I think the discussion will continue to play out but I think they played their best hand today and couldn't even get a simple majority," she said.

Bush's Democratic rival, Senator John Kerry, skipped the vote. He issued a statement expressing renewed opposition to the amendment and accusing Republicans of seeking to alter the Constitution for political gain.

This story has been viewed 3092 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top