Fri, May 07, 2004 - Page 6 News List

When ordinary people start doing horrible things

BRUTALITY Stanford researchers have shown that most regular people, when put in the position of prison guard, can quickly lose sense of what it is to be humane


In 1971, researchers at Stanford University created a simulated prison in the basement of the campus psychology building. They randomly assigned 24 students to be either prison guards or prisoners for two weeks.

Within days, the "guards" had become swaggering and sadistic, to the point of placing bags over the prisoners' heads, forcing them to strip naked and encouraging them to perform sexual acts.

The landmark Stanford experiment and studies like it give insight into how ordinary people can, under the right circumstances, do horrible things -- including the mistreatment of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

What is the distance between "normal" and "monster?" Can anyone become a torturer?

Such questions have been explored over the decades by philosophers and social scientists, and come up anew whenever shocking cases of abuse burst upon the national consciousness -- whether in the interrogation room, the police station or the high school locker room.

Hannah Arendt coined the phrase "banality of evil" to describe the very averageness of Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann. Social psychologists pursued the question more systematically, conducting experiments that demonstrated the power of situations to determine human behavior.

Dr. Philip Zimbardo, a leader of the Stanford prison study, said that while the rest of the world was shocked by the images from Iraq, "I was not surprised that it happened.

"I have exact, parallel pictures of prisoners with bags over their heads," from the 1971 study, he said.

At one point, he said, the guards in the fake prison ordered their prisoners to strip.

"You're the female camels -- bend over!" they told one group of prisoners.

They then told another group to sexually assault the females. "You're the male camels," they told the other group, and ordered them to simulate sex.

Zimbardo ended the experiment the next day, more than a week earlier than planned.

Prisons, where the balance of power is so unequal, tend to be brutal and abusive places unless great effort is made to control the guards' base impulses, he said. At Stanford and in Iraq, he added, "It's not that we put bad apples in a good barrel. We put good apples in a bad barrel. The barrel corrupts anything that it touches."

To the extent that the Abu Ghraib guards acted, as some have argued, at the request of intelligence officers, other studies, performed 40 years ago by Dr. Stanley Milgram, then a psychology professor at Yale, can also offer some explanation, researchers said.

In a famous series of experiments, Milgram, told test subjects that they were taking part in a study about teaching through punishment.

The subjects were instructed by a researcher in a white lab coat to deliver electric shocks to another participant, the "student."

Every time the student gave an incorrect answer to a question, the subject was ordered to deliver a shock.

The shocks started small, but got progressively stronger at the researcher's insistence, with labels on the machine indicating jolts of increasing intensity -- up to a huge 450 volts.

The shock machine was a fake, however, and the victims were actors who moaned and wailed. But to the test subjects, the experience was all too real.

Most exhibited great anguish as they carried out the instructions. A stunning 65 percent of the participants obeyed the commands to administer the electric shocks all the way up to the last, potentially lethal switch, marked "XXX."

This story has been viewed 3673 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top