Britain's army chiefs refused to go to war in Iraq amid fears over its legality just days before the British and American bombing campaign was launched.
The explosive new details about military doubts over the legality of the invasion are detailed in unpublished legal documents in the case of Katharine Gun, the intelligence officer dramatically freed last week after Lord Goldsmith, the UK attorney-general, dropped charges against her of breaking the Official Secrets Act.
The disclosure came as it also emerged that Goldsmith was forced to hastily redraft his legal advice to British Prime Minister Tony Blair to give an "unequivocal" assurance to the armed forces that the conflict would not be illegal.
Refusing to commit troops already stationed in Kuwait, senior military leaders were adamant that war could not begin until they were satisfied that neither they nor their men could be tried. Some 10 days later, Britain and America began the campaign.
Goldsmith also wrote to Blair at the end of January voicing concerns that the war might be illegal without a second resolution from the UN. Opposition members of parliament (MPs) seized on the revelations on Saturday night, accusing Goldsmith of caving in to political pressure from the prime minister to change his legal advice on the eve of war.
On the fence
Senior government sources involved in putting together critical legal advice on the war said that Goldsmith was originally "sitting on the fence" and that his initial advice was "prevaricating." This was "tightened" up only days before the conflict began after concerns were raised by Sir Michael Boyce, the then chief of defense staff who told senior ministers of his worries.
It is believed that Boyce demanded an unequivocal statement that the invasion of Iraq was lawful. It is understood that it was only after seeing Goldsmith's final legal advice, given days before the outbreak of war, that Boyce gave his approval.
Without this legal reassurance, military leaders and their troops could have laid themselves open to charges of war crimes. At the time, UK troops were already in Kuwait poised for an invasion.
Last week, Goldsmith controversially agreed to drop the UK government's prosecution of the former security headquarters whistleblower Katharine Gun. Her defense had demanded documents relating to his legal advice, including communications with the prime minister.
Although Goldsmith denied his decision to drop the case was political, critics of the war believe the government was desperate to prevent these details from being revealed in open court.
Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said: "These allegations go to the very heart of the government case for war, and inevitably its credibility. I have no doubt whatever that if parliament had been told these things, the government would not have achieved its majority and would have been unable to go to war. Public opinion already deeply divided would have swung overwhelmingly against the government."
Added pressure
The opposition have demanded a statement in the House of Commons from Blair and will redouble the pressure for an explanation. The revelations will also increase pressure for the Butler inquiry, set up by the prime minister into intelligence in the run-up to the war, to study the Gun case and subsequent revelations. It will take evidence in private.
Saturday night former Cabinet minister Clare Short said that she knew of military doubts over the legality the war.
"I was told at the highest level in the department that the military were saying they wouldn't go, whatever the PM said without the attorney-general's advice. The question is was the AG leant on?" Short said.
"This was a very personal operation by Tony Blair. The attorney-general is a friend of Tony's, put in the Lords by Tony and made attorney-general by Tony," she said.
It has also been established that GCHQ, the government's top-secret surveillance center, has a specialist unit dedicated to spying on the UN. The revelation will strengthen claims that the bugging of Britain's diplomatic allies at the UN was routine and is likely to trigger a fresh international furore over the legality of Britain's spying operations abroad.
The former Chilean ambassador to the UN, Juan Gabriel Valdes, said last night: "All I can say is what I said at the time when asked if I had information about spying on Chile and I said yes, it has been proved.
"It [eavesdropping] was one more element of tension during some very tense weeks. Nobody was very surprised. But it is one thing not to be surprised and another to do clearly illegal things," he said.
Gun leaked a top-secret e-mail last March revealing a joint British-American operation to spy on the UN in the run-up to war.
She claimed she acted to prevent the loss of human life in an illegal war.
Close allies
Downing Street refused on Saturday to comment on the allegations. Blair's spokesman also refused to say whether the White House had been consulted over the dropping of the Gun case, despite growing conviction at Westminster that it would have been inconceivable for the Foreign Office not to have taken its closest ally's views into consideration.
Despite Blair's refusal to give a statement to the Commons, the government is unlikely to escape further questioning. Both Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon are already due to answer questions next week while Home Secretary David Blunkett will be grilled by a joint Commons inquiry into homeland security.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese