Thu, Dec 25, 2003 - Page 6 News List

Britain looks to create more equitable honors system

TO KNIGHT OR NOT TO KNIGHT?After `The Sunday Times' published a list of those who had refused titles, Tony Blair's government vowed to create a more open honors system

AP , LONDON

Sir Mick Jagger was delighted to become a knight. Plain old Keith Richards called it a disgrace.

As with the Rolling Stones, so with British society. Some crave titles, some refuse them, some consider it all a joke.

This week, following disclosure of a long list of those who have refused titles, Prime Minister Tony Blair's government promised to make the system of awarding knighthoods and other honors more open.

Twice a year the government announces recipients of a host of titles, from knighthoods and damehoods to Companions of Honor, for exceptional achievement or service to the nation.

Though the honors are bestowed by Queen Elizabeth II, she chooses only a few. Most recipients are chosen by committees of civil servants from nominations made by the government and the public.

The Cabinet Office said Monday that all decisions about honors were made "entirely on merit."

However, one leaked document revealed that tennis star Tim Henman was being recommended for an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) to "add interest" to the list.

When the New Year's Honors are announced next week, Henman now is in the no-win situation of being revealed as considered but rejected, or given an honor for dubious reasons.

A prominent scientist, Colin Blakemore, threatened to resign as head of the Medical Research Council following reports that he was excluded from a knighthood because he is a vocal proponent of research on animals.

While rockers including Jagger, Elton John and Paul McCartney have been happy to accept knighthoods, many celebrities have quietly refused.

Rolling Stones guitarist Richards -- who apparently has not been offered an award -- criticized Jagger for accepting the "paltry honor."

The Sunday Times this week published a list of 300 well-known people -- including singer David Bowie, comedian John Cleese and actors Albert Finney and Kenneth Branagh -- who had declined honors since 1945.

Bowie turned down a Commander of the British Empire (CBE) and was quoted as saying he would never accept a knighthood.

"I seriously don't know what it's for," he said.

Writer J.G. Ballard, whose novels include Crash and Empire of the Sun, said he had turned down a CBE for services to literature.

"I am opposed to the honors system. The whole thing is a preposterous charade," he was quoted as saying by The Sunday Times.

The list also showed that some who refused later agreed to receive an honor -- in some cases at a higher rank, or perhaps from a government more to their taste.

One of the most famous changes of heart was Winston Churchill, who said he could not accept a knighthood of the Order of the Garter from King George VI after losing the 1945 election -- "given the order of the boot by the people," as he put it.

In 1953, back in power, Churchill accepted a knighthood from the queen.

The government says about 2 percent of the 3,000 people chosen for honors decline. Most do so quietly, but last month poet Benjamin Zephaniah announced that he had rejected an OBE because the title reminded him of "thousands of years of brutality."

"Stick it, Mr. Blair and Mrs. Queen, stop going on about empire," he added in an article for The Guardian newspaper.

Grumbling over titles is nothing new.

In the 13th century, when knights were expected to do military service, so many men declined the honor that King Henry III began imposing fines on those who refused, according to Debrett's Peerage & Baronetage.

This story has been viewed 2395 times.
TOP top