|
Iraqis get taste for democracy at town-hall meetings
GOVERNANCE:
The function of Iraq's neighborhood, district and city councils, offers a glimpse of what a future democratic regime in the war-torn country might look like
NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE, BAGHDAD
Monday, Dec 01, 2003, Page 6
They are the vanguard of democracy in Iraq, and they like to say they are a most unhappy lot.
"I resent my work; it's very frustrating," said Imad Salih, shaking his head, "I hate it."
Salih is among more than 800 men and women who were elected, or selected, to serve on 88 Baghdad neighborhood councils, nine district councils and one city council, at the encouragement of the US occupation authorities.
They have no authority, no budget, no real power. And for many Iraqis, that is demeaning, if not insulting.
The national Governing Council ignores them. Government ministers will not see them. The City Council members do not merit much respect even at City Hall. A few days ago the lobby receptionist told the City Council chairman he did not recognize him and at first refused to let him in the building.
On top of those problems, some local council members have become targets for anti-American guerrillas. One member of the Mansour regional council reported during a meeting last week that he had found a hand grenade in his house along with a note ordering him to stop working for the council.
Now the council members, and others like them chosen by the Americans in cities and towns across Iraq, are part of the acrimonious debate over the future of the US plan to speed up the transition to self-rule.
Under the US plan, these council members are to play a role in choosing the "transitional assembly" that is to select the next interim government, though some of the council members hope to remain on the ensuing councils.
Hardly anyone, however, seems to think this role in the transition is a good idea.
"These people who have been appointed, we can't say all of them are loyal to the new Iraq," said Jalal Talabani, who is the current head of the Governing Council.
"Some of them are former Baathists," said Mowaffak al-Rubaie, another council member, referring to the party of Saddam Hussein.
No one anticipated this. When they set up the local councils, the Americans appeared to have believed they were performing an important civic function for the Iraqi people. It is the Americans who pay them: City Council members get US$296 a month; those on the District Council receive US$176; and the Neighborhood Council members are paid US$104.
Even with their frustrations, many of the Iraqis chosen to serve say they have been proud to be part of the experiment, several said in interviews. What is more, many of these council members' friends and neighbors are clamoring to be on the councils, too. And even those council members who clench their fists as they complain about their lack of any real power will begrudgingly admit that they appreciate the opportunity.
"Most Iraqis don't know the meaning of democracy," said Yaquob Yousiff al-Bakhatti, who is on the Baghdad City Advisory Council. "So this is a good thing. It is above good."
The US military, in concert with civilian occupation authorities, created the city's elaborate council system last summer out of need -- and civic ambition.
"The purpose was to lay the foundation for local democratic governance, but at the same time, the military needed people to communicate with," said Lieutenant-Colonel Joe Rice, a former mayor of Glendale, Colorado, who helped create the councils and continues to work with them.
Whatever their role in the self-government plan, a look at the councils' work may provide a glimpse of what democracy in Iraq will look like.
At a Baghdad City Council meeting last week, 27 council members -- 23 men and four women -- were ranged around a large rectangular table in a formal meeting hall at City Hall. The council chairman, Adnan Abdul Sahid, sat at a raised dais. To his right, at the short end of the rectangle, sat a group of US military and civilian officers, including Rice, each with a translator whispering in his ear. As the meeting plodded along, none of the Americans said a word.
Late in the morning the council plunged headlong into a discussion of national healthcare financing. In capsule form they articulated problems that, in the US, have consumed millions of hours of study and debate over the past decade. The Iraqis disposed of them quickly.
"We have been trying to finance the system from our own revenues," one councilman explained. "But it isn't working. The prices are too high for the citizens, but they aren't enough for the hospitals. The minister of health has ordered prices reduced by 50 percent. But we should cancel this whole system of self-financing. We need a system that makes sure everyone gets complete medical care."
Without dispute, the council agreed to send a letter to the Health Ministry calling for the abolition of free-market healthcare financing. And that, some Americans say, is the chief weakness of the infant councils.
"They jump to big conclusions without enough critical thinking or study," said one American adviser. "It's almost an emotional thing. It's getting better, but it will take time."
At the same time, the council members are being given rude lessons in government bureaucracy. Later during the meeting, midway through a discussion of problems many Iraqis have acquiring a reliable supply of propane canisters for cooking, a council member blurted out in somewhat surprised frustration: "Whenever I try to investigate the problem, everyone gives me 6,000 excuses. I can't find the truth!"
This story has been viewed 1857 times.
|