Asylum seekers in the UK will have their children taken into care in a Draconian attempt to force them to go home, under a crackdown condemned last night as "inhumane" by refugee groups.
Parents whose claims have been rejected will be offered a stark choice: take a "voluntary" flight to their native country, paid for by the Government, or lose all benefits in the UK and have their children taken away.
Up to 2,000 youngsters could be affected by the immigration clampdown, to be revealed in this week's Queen's Speech. The Prime Minister will follow it by publishing his "Prospectus," a list of manifesto ideas to be put up for public debate to try to show Labour is listening.
On Saturday, as outraged refugee groups condemned the asylum-seeker plan, John Denham -- a loyalist former Home Office Minister -- warned that parents might simply go underground, surrendering children to the state in the mistaken belief that they would be better off raised in Britain.
"Faced with that choice, families might disappear and leave their children in care, thinking that may be the better option, because at least the children would get to stay in Britain and perhaps the adults would get to stay here, albeit working illegally," said Denham, who chairs the Home Affairs Select Committee.
"It will be important to look closely at the proposals the Government brings forward, otherwise we could end up with quite significant costs of looked-after children without achieving any increase in removals. What might look completely unpalatable to somebody who is looking at it through a traditional British nuclear family might not look quite the same in cultures more used to relying on extended families," Denham said.
The planned Asylum Bill would also see refugees arriving without ID documents risking jail, and the curtailment of rights of appeal against rejection. The Queen's Speech comes on the eve of quarterly asylum statistics covering September, the month by which Tony Blair promised to halve the number of asylum seekers.
Ministers hope Labour MPs -- many of whom represent white working-class constituents increasingly resentful of immigrants -- will be reluctant to oppose a crackdown. The Government was encouraged by surprisingly muted backbench reaction to Home Secretary David Blunkett's plan for ID cards, which he portrayed as a weapon against illegal immigration.
They are, however, braced for a revolt over top-up fees, while MPs will also be furious if -- as expected -- they are refused another bill to ban foxhunting because of Downing Street's fears that it may clog the legislative programme. However, there will be sweeteners for the Left, including new legal rights for gay couples, safeguards for occupational pensions, and planned "baby bonds" -- cash invested at birth for every newborn.
There will also be new mea-sures to tackle domestic violence; the creation of an independent children's commissioner; and a draft bill paving the way for a single currency vote, although not in this parliament.
The controversy surfaced when Immigration Minister Beverly Hughes was questioned by Denham's committee last Wednesday.
Currently, single asylum seekers whose claims fail have their benefits withdrawn pending deportation, which can drag on for years. Families, however, continue to be supported by the state, because of the legal duty to protect children's welfare.
RSS