North Korea took less than a day to break one of the modest agreements it had made with the US and four other nations during talks on its nuclear program: a promise not to say anything to aggravate the 10-month-old nuclear standoff.
"The talks only reinforced our confidence that there is no other option for us but to further increase the nuclear-deterrent force," the North's Foreign Ministry said Saturday, its first official comment on the six-nation summit that ended in Beijing a day earlier.
North Korea has made similar threats before, and its trademark bluster often fails to draw urgent reactions from the ones it wants to threaten.
Instead, the region's dialogue partners, although they consider North Korea capable of such dangerous provocations as a missile test-launch, see the isolated country's harsh rhetoric as reflecting its entrenched mistrust of Americans and fear for the survival of its own totalitarian regime.
All six nations -- including China, Russia, South Korea and Japan -- say they want the Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons. But the question comes down to whether the countries at the center of the dispute, the US and North Korea, can trust each other, and which should make the first move to untie the Gordian knot.
Should the US provide free oil shipments, open diplomatic ties, provide economic and humanitarian aid and sign a nonaggression pact before North Korea feels safe to abandon its nuclear facilities? Or should the North scrap its nuclear program before Washington improves relations?
"Both sides are leveling guns at each other. How can the DPRK trust the US and drop its gun?" said the North Korean spokesman, using his country's official name, Democratic People's Republic of Korea. "What we want is for both sides to drop guns at the same time and coexist peacefully."
The Americans consider North Koreans untrustworthy and want to avoid mistakes like the nuclear accord they signed with the North in 1994.
Under that agreement, the North promised to freeze its nuclear activities in return for economic aid, including US$4.6 billion for power plants still under construction. But US officials said last October that North Korea admitted running a secret nuclear weapons program -- a claim North Korea now denies.
North Korea, too, says it can't take any chances when dealing with the Americans. Kim Jong-il's regime sees its survival as depending on how profitably it plays its nuclear card.
After the crumbling of the Soviet bloc, which sustained North Korea with trade and arms deals, the country slipped into economic quagmire and now attempts to earn its way through by selling missiles and trading its "nuclear deterrent force" for economic aid and a US promise not to attempt a regime change in Pyongyang. Washington calls the tactic "nuclear blackmail."
"North Korea's statement [on Saturday] seems to be aimed at pressuring the United States, since it believes it hasn't gained anything from the six-way talks," said Koh Yoo-hwan, a North Korea expert at Seoul's Dongkuk University.
Striving to mediate a compromise, the six nations agreed this week to seek a solution with "synchronized, or parallel, stages of implementation." What comes first in these phased-in stages could take years -- and more North Korean threats and delicate diplomacy -- to sort out.
RSS