The nation has come across information pertaining to Chinese intervention in the Jan. 11 presidential and legislative elections, the Presidential Office said yesterday.
The office issued the statement in response to media reports that quoted self-confessed Chinese spy Wang Liqiang as saying that Beijing meddled in Taiwan’s nine-in-one elections last year, and is attempting to sway the electorate in the January elections.
In addition to directing positive media attention toward certain politicians, such as Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kou-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, Wang was quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald as saying that China Innovation Investment Ltd was a key agency in his operations, which also helped finance opposition groups and temples.
Photo: CNA
The Presidential Office said in a statement that national security agencies have obtained information on Chinese intervention and formed a task force to investigate Wang’s claims, adding that those implicated in the alleged operations would be punished according to the law.
Chinese interference in Taiwanese elections is not new, as many foreign governments and media organizations have alerted the government to Beijing’s interference in last year’s elections, but security agencies have been closely monitoring the situation and responding accordingly, the Presidential Office said, adding that further investigation is needed to confirm the details of the case.
Further comment is not possible at this time, as the case involves intelligence cooperation across various countries, it added.
The Mainland Affairs Council yesterday warned China not to encroach on Taiwan’s democracy, saying that the government would step up security, judiciary proceedings and administrative measures to ensure that January’s elections proceed justly and fairly.
Taiwanese law bans foreign entities from making donations to candidates or political groups, and from intervening in elections via illicit means, the council said, referring to the Political Donations Act (政治獻金法), the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) and the Criminal Code.
Taiwan is willing to work with Australia, the US and other like-minded countries to combat disinformation campaigns and improper intervention by foreign entities to ensure the elections fully reflect the voice of Taiwanese, Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Joanne Ou (歐江安) said in separate statement yesterday.
As a free democracy and a member of the Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan would firmly defend its hard-won democratic establishments against authoritarian invasion, Ou said.
The ministry also called on other like-minded countries to join in resisting and condemning any attempts by foreign entities to meddle with democratic processes, Ou added.
Beijing’s interventions into Taiwan’s elections have become ever more blatant, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who is seeking re-election as the Democratic Progressive Party’s candidate, said yesterday.
Taiwanese should watch out for Beijing’s attempts at sabotage, otherwise the nation’s most valuable asset — its democratic election system — might be damaged, she added.
Additional reporting by Lin Chia-nan
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods