Media and broadcast experts are urging the government to avoid over use of social media for policy announcements and promotions, as the speed at which information spreads on the Internet — for both good and bad — has become so fast.
Danny Lin (林柏蒼), former chief executive officer of the micro-blogging service Plurk, who also previously worked on Yahoo Messenger, said government agencies should have guidelines regarding the use of social networking Web sites for policy promotion.
Communicating with and managing an online community is an ongoing process of noticing minutiae within the group, and it is much more than simply budgeting a sum for the endeavor, Lin said.
Photo: Hung Mei-hsiu, Taipei Times
Government agencies’ media or communications departments should be responsible for recruiting social network managers who can serve as the department’s voice on the Internet, he said.
These managers should provide reports analyzing media responses to government policy so that improvements or corrections can be made, Lin said.
Crisis-management should be handled with transparency and should be quick and neat, he added.
However, social networking Web sites are not the main platform on which the government should announce its policies, he said.
Instead, agencies should provide links to their own Web sites after making announcements on social media, allowing transparency and ease of access to information, Lin added.
Facebook is the predominant social networking site in Taiwan and its primary users are between the ages of 30 and 50 years old, the prime demographic to target with pictures or short videos with easy-to-read text to promote governmental policy, he said.
“Government agencies should avoid topics that might incite flame-wars to avoid losing focus on the government’s message,” he added.
Flame wars are when users engage each other in a lengthy and abusive back-and-forth over a particular subject or issue.
They should also refrain from overemphasizing the potential engagement on a post and should instead ensure that the public knows and understands the content of the policies, he said.
New policies would best be announced on specially created campaign sites — which should be easy on the eyes and accessible to the public — to offer the public a closer view of the policy, he said, adding that suitability of popular live-streamers should be assessed before they are approached to work with the government, as some of them might undercut the government’s message.
Governmental commissions to companies for policy promotions could focus on the wrong kinds of key performance indicators, which might result in “likes” and shares of a post, but could lose sight of the necessary balance they must keep for governmental policies, Lin said.
Instagram, highly favored by the younger generation, is more useful to promote easily understood concepts, but should not be the go-to medium for prolonged discussions, Lin added.
Du Sheng-tsung (杜聖聰), chair of Ming Chuan University’s radio and television department, said that while new platforms should be considered in the Internet age, one should not blindly select Internet celebrities or popular live-streamers to promote government policies simply because it is the trend in the corporate world or elsewhere.
The public should be told the logic behind any government policy, he said.
They should also be informed about why certain celebrities have been selected to promote the policies and whether the effects and “fairness” of the promotion of a policy by these individuals was considered during the decision-making process, Du added.
The Government Procurement Act (政府採購法) offers clear legal guidelines on how the government spends its money and those hiring such celebreties need to observe the regulations, he said.
The government must also provide information about the source of funding for the celebrity spokepeople, Du added.
“Everything should be transparent,” he said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all