Liberty Times (LT): Can you describe what issues the Judicial Yuan’s proposed amendment to the Judges Act (法官法) addresses, aside from being a statement of intent for reforms?
Lu Tai-lang (呂太郎): The primary purpose of the draft amendment is to introduce a system — namely two organizations: the judges’ evaluation and assessment committee and the court of the judiciary — that would introduce more checks and counters to remove judges who are unsuitable for the job.
We hope the draft amendment will be passed at the Legislative Yuan during this session.
Photo: Huang Yao-cheng, Taipei Times
In theory, the committee would be tasked with investigating any allegations lodged against judges. In the current proposal, the committee would consist of three judges, one prosecutor, three lawyers and four individuals of upright and outstanding character, or academics.
In light of opinions that the committee should include more people, the draft submitted to be reviewed by the legislature would increase the number of academics or individuals to six.
Under current regulations, should a plaintiff or defendant feel that they have been unfairly treated in court, they have no viable channel for recourse. The only way to apply for an investigation into a judge would require mediation between organizations such as the Taiwan Bar Association or the Judicial Reform Foundation.
The issue was brought up repeatedly during the National Congress on Judicial Reform held by the Presidential Office in 2017 as something that did not make sense.
To address such issues, the draft includes a clause that both plaintiff and defendant alike could ask the committee to launch an investigation. This should allow questionable or controversial incidents in court to be brought to the committee’s attention.
To prevent either party in a legal dispute from using the system to achieve certain objectives, there would be filtering mechanics built into the system to prevent the committee from being flooded with requests and thus grinding to a halt.
Pending the result of the committee’s investigation, if a judge is found to have erred, but only in a minor sense, they would be given certain penalties by the Judicial Yuan.
According to the draft, the Judicial Yuan can issue to the Control Yuan a recall complaint for judges. If accepted and processed, the former judge would have to attend the court of the judiciary, which would mete out its punishment.
Which brings us to the second point of our draft: the introduction of the court of the judiciary. As it is currently planned, judges at the court of the judiciary would be selected from all circuits.
To address concerns that this might lead to judges covering for each other and preventing true reform, two significant changes have been made to the draft amendments.
As it stands, the court of the judiciary would be unable to help, even with the intervention of the Control Yuan, should any case receive a definitive final ruling at the first trial.
To mitigate this, should the draft be approved, the court of the judiciary would be divided into first and second trials. Those in the court of the judiciary presiding over the first trial portion would be experienced judges with two academics or experts who are not judges.
The division of the judiciary would allow both parties in a legal dispute to apply directly for an investigation into a court case.
Inclusion of members of the public at the court committee and the court of the judiciary would greatly strengthen measures to remove unsuitable judges.
LT: How do you view opposition from the Judges’ Association regarding the Judicial Yuan’s amendments to the Judges Act?
Lu: The association’s opposition could stem from its views that either party in a legal dispute that goes to court could, by applying for an investigation, abuse such functions and bog down the judiciary system.
They need not be too concerned. We plan to allot more staff for the committee than is currently planned and these staff members would be tasked with filtering applications. Any cases that are evidently illegal or an abuse of the system, or make no sense at all, would be discarded.
Allowing both parties in a legal dispute to apply for an assessment would not infringe upon the independence of the judiciary. While the Judicial Yuan will uphold such independence, we must also have an established method to react to and handle alleged inappropriate or illegal actions by judges.
LT: A poll conducted earlier this year by National Chung Cheng University showed that more than 80 percent of respondents did not believe in the validity of judges’ rulings. What suggestions would you offer to the judiciary to reclaim the public’s trust?
Lu: There are other opinions regarding the poll among professional pollsters. The poll only asked one or two questions and was subsumed under the greater rubric of social safety.
However, the poll does reflect, on a certain level, the view of the public, and the Judicial Yuan will consider it a point of reference as we continue to better ourselves.
Over the past few years, judges’ lack of understanding of society, and in turn, the lack of understanding of the law by the public, have led to record low public trust in the judiciary.
To address this issue, the Judicial Yuan has made an effort to include the public in judicial processes.
If the average citizen could become a judge, they could bring their own emotions, experience and values to the table. On the other hand, they would, through participation in court procedures, understand that the determination of how an act is considered criminal is very meticulous.
Through such an experience, they would come to a new understanding of our judiciary system, thereby increasing their trust in the system.
Translated by staff writer Jake Chung
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods