Academics and civil groups have voiced concern over an offer by China’s Supreme People’s Court last week to extend certain judicial services to Taiwanese, citing China’s poor human rights records.
The court listed 36 measures that officials said would “benefit Taiwanese” and “promote cross-strait integration,” ranging from allowing Taiwanese to use their Chinese residency card for identification in lawsuits before the Supreme Court, letting them apply for legal assistance, audit trials and meet with their guardian, or relatives after being indicted, unless doing so would undermine their trail, to possibly hiring Taiwanese as court clerks and promoting court internship programs for Taiwanese.
A service for Taiwanese detained in China would inform their family of their situation within 24 hours of their detention, the court said.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
By offering an increasing number of benefits to its residency cardholders, the Chinese government is apparently attempting to “domesticize Taiwanese affairs” and turn the residency cards into a national identification card, said Hu Po-yen (胡博硯), an associate law professor at Soochow University.
The new measures would only apply to the Supreme Court, which means Chinese prosecutors, police and security authorities could still arrest and detain Taiwanese without informing anyone, he added.
China’s judiciary does not have the same judicial independence and awareness in human rights as many other countries do, and has little credibility, he said.
“The 36 measures sound nice, but whether they would be followed through is another question,” he said.
There have been plenty of cases where Chinese authorities handled judicial cases arbitrarily and unfairly for a variety of reasons, citing the detention and conviction of Taiwanese human rights advocate Lee Ming-che (李明哲) and telecom fraud suspects, Taiwan Association for Human Rights secretary-general Chiu Ee-ling (邱伊翎) said.
In most cases, Taiwanese families cannot even find out where a relative is being held and the progress of their trial, she said.
Chinese authorities can do whatever they want to Taiwanese, as “human rights are never guaranteed there and the so-called benefits are not real,” she said.
The Mainland Affairs Council said it would be illegal for a Taiwanese to work as a court clerk in China, as clerks are civil servants and the government has, since 2004, banned Taiwanese from working as civil servants in China.
If a Taiwanese accepted such a post, they would be asked to offer an explanation and the council would review related evidence with other government agencies, it said.
Under the Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement (海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議) and other pacts, China is supposed to notify Taiwan when a Taiwanese is detained in China and allow family visits.
Additional reporting by staff writer
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods