The Taipei Women’s Rescue Foundation yesterday proposed a draft bill to ban revenge pornography, saying current laws are insufficient to prevent the crime and protect victims.
Recent years have seen increased cases of cyberattacks against women, with the majority of them being revenge pornography, foundation chief executive Fan Ching (范情) said.
While the precise number of victims is unknown, the foundation this year alone has helped approximately 200 victims of revenge pornography and the media on average reports one such case every day, foundation deputy executive officer Jasmine Bai (白智芳) told a news conference in Taipei.
Under current law, victims of revenge pornography who wish to press charges against those distributing the photographs or videos typically have to sue them for contravening their privacy or distributing obscene content, lawyer Mik Chen (陳明清) said.
However, the provisions on such offenses in the Criminal Code were written before cybercrime became prevalent and do not offer victims the protection they deserve, he said.
“By suing others for distributing obscene content, the victim in a way makes herself the subject of something considered obscene and most find that unacceptable,” Chen said.
Revenge pornography is only considered a contravention of someone’s privacy under the Criminal Code if the victim never agreed to the filming or photography in the first place, even when the victim later refuses permission to share the content with others, he said.
While distributors of obscene content are sentenced to no more than two years in prison, contravention of privacy is most often punished by fining the perpetrator, lawyer Chu Fang-chun (朱芳君) said.
Under the draft act proposed by the foundation, which has worked on it with a group of 10 experts for a year, anyone who distributes a person’s intimate, sexual photographs or videos without their consent, even when the person had previously agreed to the photographs or video being taken, is guilty of distributing revenge pornography and would be subject to a prison sentence of between six month and five years, Chen said.
“The punishment should be more severe if the distributor has used the sexual content to blackmail the victim,” he added.
For victims, there is nothing worse than having unwanted content distributed on the Internet, because there is no way to ensure it is completely removed, Chu said.
Considering that, the draft act also requires that Internet service providers to remove the content and preserve the evidence within 24 hours of being informed by police of a revenge pornography case, she said.
Internet service providers that fail to comply would be fined between NT$200,000 and NT$1 million (US$6,554 and US$32,770), she added.
The draft act also bans the media from revealing any information that could disclose the identity of a revenge pornography victim, she said, adding that those who do would be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$1 million.
The draft act also requires the distributor to cover all the expenses incurred when removing the content from the Internet, she said.
The foundation is to hold a public hearing with Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) next month to discuss and promote the draft act, Fan said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods