The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus yesterday brought legal charges against Minister of Economic Affairs Shen Jong-chin (沈榮津), accusing the ministry of agreeing to purchase wind power from seven local and foreign firms at a greatly inflated price, which would result in taxpayers losing NT$900 billion (US$29.5 billion).
The ministry, in a first round of tenders, awarded the bid to the seven companies at NT$5.8 per kilowatt-hour (kWh), but in the second round, which began about two months later, accepted offers from other companies to supply wind power at less than half that price — NT$2.5 per kWh, KMT caucus whip Lin Te-fu (林德福) told a news conference.
Lin said he suspected that some parties have raked in an exorbitant profit and called on prosecutors and investigators to investigate the contracting process.
Photo: CNA
The first bid awarded by the ministry was for 3.83 million gigawatts of wind power over 20 years, which when taking into account the price difference between the two tenders, would translate to a loss of more than NT$900 billion of taxpayers’ money, KMT caucus deputy secretary-general William Tseng (曾銘宗) said.
Unlike the second call for bids, the first was an “opaque” selection process, which was “odd,” as government agencies usually hold open bidding to bring down the price when contracting work, before introducing a selection process when subsequently soliciting tenders, he said.
The ministry seemed to be “doing things backwards,” and he suspects misconduct, Tseng said.
It is the KMT caucus’ firm stance that the first bid awarded for the project should be revoked, KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said.
The ministry had “not done its homework” before the first call for bids and was ingratiating itself with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Premier William Lai (賴清德) by carrying out the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “impractical” energy policy to phase out nuclear energy, while boosting the proportion of renewables to 20 percent in 2025, Lai Shyh-bao said.
Following the news conference, six KMT legislators — Lin, Tseng, Lai Shyh-bao, Alex Fai (費鴻泰), Ko Chih-en (柯志恩) and Yosi Takun — lodged a suit against the ministry at the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office.
Responding on behalf of Shen, Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Tseng Wen-sheng (曾文生) called a news conference and said the price of offshore wind power had gradually risen from NT$4.19 per kWh in 2009 to NT$6.04 per kWh last year, before slightly falling to NT$5.8 per kWh this year.
If the ministry had wanted to benefit companies, why then would it initiate an open bidding process in the second round to drive down costs? he asked.
The government offered to pay NT$5.8 for each kWh of offshore wind power because no contractors were willing to undertake the project at NT$5.7 per kWh, he said.
If the bids awarded in the first-round call for tenders were revoked, it could discourage contractors from the second round and jeopardize the entire project, he said.
The ministry would humbly accept any criticism of its policies, but cannot tolerate unfounded accusations and character assassinations targeting public servants, he said.
Additional reporting by CNA
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods