Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) claims that his re-election campaign is low on funds and he has been forced to use his home as collateral for a bank loan are inaccurate because he can tap city government resources, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) said yesterday.
Ko said twice last week that it would be difficult for him to run a campaign because he lacks resources and does not have a political party or foundation supporting him, before saying on Friday evening that he used his home as collateral for a bank loan of about NT$20 million (US$659,913.55).
Large election events cost too much, and he is thinking of running a campaign “in a more modern way,” Ko said ahead of his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) challenger, Legislator Pasuya Yao (姚文智), holding his first large campaign event on Saturday evening.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Ko’s wife, Peggy Chen (陳佩琪), also discussed the couple’s finances on her Facebook page, after DPP Taipei City Councilor Ruan Jhao-syong (阮昭雄) on Saturday criticized the mayor for not explaining how the couple’s mortgage had “disappeared” from asset declaration information.
Ruan also serves as Yao’s campaign office spokesperson.
Ko was only pretending to lack resources and has underestimated the wisdom of Taipei residents, Ting said.
As mayor, Ko has access to a variety of resources, such as the ability to ask the Taipei Research, Development and Evaluation Commission to conduct opinion polls, or include his promotional messages in city departments’ advertisements, Ting said.
Ruan said that Ko should not criticize how other people use their campaign funds without explaining his own finances, and he needed to explain how a mortgage of about NT$30 million had “disappeared” from the couple’s asset declaration information, which Ko is obligated to explain.
Chen on Saturday posted photographs of documents, including the mortgage loan and income tax documents, on Facebook.
She wrote that the couple bought their home with a mortgage of about NT$35 million in 2010, borrowing NT$10 million from Ko’s parents, which they repaid in 2011.
They repaid the remaining NT$21.19 million with the combined salaries of NT$30.49 million between 2011 and 2014, Chen said.
When they declared their assets on Sept 21, 2014, they said that they still owed Ko’s parents NT$10 million and the bank NT$3.81 million.
“My husband is running for government office and should publicize his income and spending. I agree with his idea of not holding large campaign events,” Chen said. “He said these events cost too much money, but people with financial and human resources can use those things to boost their election spending, as long as they can explain to the public where the money comes from.”
Ko yesterday said his wife is in charge of the family’s finances and she is very meticulous, so she has detailed bookkeeping data.
“Ruan forgot one thing — I was still a doctor at National Taiwan University Hospital between 2011 and 2014,” he said, adding that Ruan got the date wrong and was speaking only from memory.
His opponents’ campaign offices should “do more research” before criticizing others, the mayor said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods