Lawmakers yesterday traded barbs over whether the Presidential Office should answer to the Legislative Yuan on the issue of judicial reform, after Presidential Office Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) was absent from a legislative session.
Wu, Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Lu Tai-lang (呂太郎) and Minister of Justice Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) were invited by the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee to make a report to the National Congress on Judicial Reform, which concluded in August.
However, Wu abstained from the committee meeting and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers refused to register their attendance despite their presence to prevent the session from commencing due to a lack of quorum.
Wu and DPP lawmakers defended his absence, saying it was unconstitutional to request a Presidential Office official to answer for judicial reform issues, which fall outside the office’s jurisdiction, even though it helped lead the reform initiative and organize the congress.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alicia Wang (王育敏), who chaired the session, criticized what she said was Wu’s contempt for the legislature and the DPP’s blindness in defending his absence.
The DPP caucus had four times requested a Presidential Office secretary-general to stand in legislative sessions over issues, including a fatal shooting in 2013 in which a Taiwanese fisherman was killed by Philippine officials and the meeting between former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in 2015, Wang said.
“There is no issue of unconstitutionality in the planned agenda of judicial reform today. The DPP should not overstate the issue just because you want to defend Wu,” Wang said.
As the Presidential Office had used the government’s budget to organize the congress’ meetings and public hearings, it should answer to the Legislative Yuan, KMT Legislator Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) said.
Lin also questioned the appointment criteria for congress members, which he said were never explained by the Presidential Office, Lin said.
Judicial reform is the shared duty of the Legislative Yuan, the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice, not of the Presidential Office, DPP Legislator Tsai Yi-yu (蔡易餘) said, adding that the congress’ conclusions were of an advisory nature and were not legally binding.
The KMT caucus raised a motion to condemn Wu for abstaining, but the DPP caucus voted it down.
Meanwhile, Lu said that the Judicial Yuan is planning its own proposals for judicial reform.
It is to propose blueprints for a lay judge system, which would ensure public participation in the judicial process, and a “judicial pyramid” system to improve the accuracy of first trials, which would reduce lawsuit abuse, Lu said.
It is to also propose publishing and uploading judicial documents, establishing specialized courts — such as juvenile courts — and diversifying the recruitment of judges, Lu said.
To improve fairness, efficiency and transparency, the ministry plans to designate a group of prosecutors to handle key cases collectively, instead of an individual prosecutor as per current practice, Chiu said.
It also plans to publish indictments immediately when a first verdict is handed down, and to limit the number of times a higher prosecutors’ office can return a case to a lower office for reconsideration to one, Chiu added.
Live-streaming court proceedings would be possible in revisio in jure trials, which deal only with the interpretation of the laws applicable to a case, rather than establishing the facts of a case, Lu said, adding that a draft law authorizing live-streaming could be finalized by 2019.
The Judicial Yuan is designing a lay judge system that incorporates the spirit of the jury system by having lay judges and professional judges collectively rule on a case, with lay judges to receive prior legal training, Lu said.
DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-ching (葉宜津) said the DPP caucus could not endorse the Judicial Yuan’s or the ministry’s reform drafts wholesale, especially when there are conflicting views between the two bodies and the congress.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) mention of Taiwan’s official name during a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Wednesday was likely a deliberate political play, academics said. “As I see it, it was intentional,” National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies professor Wang Hsin-hsien (王信賢) said of Ma’s initial use of the “Republic of China” (ROC) to refer to the wider concept of “the Chinese nation.” Ma quickly corrected himself, and his office later described his use of the two similar-sounding yet politically distinct terms as “purely a gaffe.” Given Ma was reading from a script, the supposed slipup
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
The bodies of two individuals were recovered and three additional bodies were discovered on the Shakadang Trail (砂卡礑) in Taroko National Park, eight days after the devastating earthquake in Hualien County, search-and-rescue personnel said. The rescuers reported that they retrieved the bodies of a man and a girl, suspected to be the father and daughter from the Yu (游) family, 500m from the entrance of the trail on Wednesday. The rescue team added that despite the discovery of the two bodies on Friday last week, they had been unable to retrieve them until Wednesday due to the heavy equipment needed to lift