Academics yesterday weighed in on Friday’s meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), saying that they were relieved that Taiwan was not on the agenda in the first meeting between the two leaders.
The Trump-Xi meeting was more symbolic than substantial, National Chung Hsing University international politics professor Tsai Ming-yan (蔡明彥) said.
In the meeting between Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in February, Tsai said the US and Japan issued a post-meeting joint statement reasserting the US’ commitment to maintaining Japan’s security and consolidating the US-Japan coalition, a contrast to this week’s meeting.
The seemingly harmonious atmosphere during Thursday and Friday’s meeting was contrived, Tsai said, because a post-meeting news conference held by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson revealed that fundamental issues between the US and China need to be addressed, such as the US’ trade deficit with China and Beijing’s breach of international convention by military expansion into the South China and East China seas.
What Trump and Xi established were channels for future dialogue on trade, foreign policy, information security, religious freedom and human rights, Tsai said, adding that he believes the specific topics set to be discussed via these channels would help them operate more effectively than former US president Barack Obama’s US-China Strategic Economic Dialogue, which failed to help the two sides engage.
Tsai said that the US in a pre-meeting news conference reiterated its commitment to Taiwan by stressing the importance of the Taiwan Relations Act, that it is against China annexing Taiwan by force and that it would continue to move bilateral cooperation forward.
“This signaled to China that Washington’s ‘one China’ policy is different from Beijing’s ‘one China’ principle, and that there is not much room for the US to make concessions on Taiwan affairs, which are not to be bargained with,” Tsai said.
“With the high level of importance the Trump administration attaches to the Taiwan Relations Act, China will likely have to make adjustments [to its Taiwan policy], while Taiwan can capitalize on [the US’] proper handling of its competitive and cooperative relationship with China, thus continuing to strengthen the Taiwan-US partnership under the framework set by the act,” he added.
“The fact that Taiwan was not on the agenda was the best we could have hoped for,” National Taiwan Normal University political science professor Fan Shih-ping (范世平) said.
Trump’s aides are likely to urge Beijing to resume interactions with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, as its current policy “does not work” and only motivates more Taiwanese to join the pan-green political camp in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election, Fan said.
Trump and Xi might have seemed cordial toward each other at a banquet on Friday, but it was about the same time that Trump attacked Syrian military facilities, which was “embarrassing” for Xi, because China has spoken against US military intervention in Syria, Fan said.
Trump’s move was aimed at asserting the US’ leadership and to show Xi that the US would be capable of launching a similar assault on North Korea, pressuring Xi to clarify his stance on Korean Peninsula tensions, he added.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods