Pro-China unification advocates and historians yesterday called for a “return to the true history” and a “correcting of the twisted [interpretation of the] 228 Incident.”
At a seminar organized by the Taiwan Area Political Victims Mutual Help Association, the Taiwan Region Association for the Settlement of Incidents and the Cross-Strait Peace and Development Union, the groups said that the Incident was a popular uprising against the ruling regime’s abuse of power and corruption, “not a communist-instigated rebellion championed as political propaganda by the [Chinese Nationalist Party, KMT] regime.
“Cross-strait relations have reached a turning point of either peace or war. We have to let Taiwanese know that what the 228 Incident was calling for was democracy and autonomy under Chinese sovereignty,” they said.
Politicians who advocate Taiwanese independence and “historians with no academic conscientiousness” have distorted the history of the Incident by “erecting Taiwanese independence tombstones on the graves of 228 Incident and White Terror victims” and “stealing political gains from historical tragedy.”
“Cross-strait relations have reached a turning point of either peace or war. We have to let Taiwanese know that what the 228 Incident was calling for was democracy and autonomy under Chinese sovereignty,” they said.
Chiu Shih-chieh (邱士杰), a doctoral candidate in the Department of History at National Taiwan University, said the then-KMT regime had presupposed that Taiwan had been enslaved by the Japanese imperial government and needed to be re-educated to become Chinese.
The KMT inherited colonial rule, which contributed to “the fact that Taiwanese did not have autonomy or a chance to fight [for a return to China] during the War of Resistance against Japan, while they held the strong opinion that the [KMT regime] was foreign,” Chiu said.
“The Incident was not a conflict between Taiwanese and Mainlanders [Chinese] or a product of the Japanese colonial government’s effort to make Taiwanese into its imperial subjects, but a product of the KMT’s oppression,” he said.
“Mainlanders and Taiwanese actually helped each other during the Incident,” Chiu said.
Cheng Hong-sheng (鄭鴻生), an author, said that because Taiwan did not help create a “new China,” it has had negative consequences.
“Although Taiwanese since 1949 have received a KMT regime-designed education filled with the spirit of the Chinese nation [zhonghua minzu], it was not complete, as it was founded upon opposition to [Communist China],” Cheng said, adding that the problem “we Taiwanese face is how to learn to be Chinese again.”
Shih Hsin University professor Wang Hsiao-po (王曉波) said the 228 Incident should not be used to drive a wedge between Taiwanese and mainlanders, or become a reason to support Taiwanese independence.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods