Legal professionals had mixed reactions over an interpretation the Council of Grand Justices handed down on Friday that denial of access to case files for defendants and their lawyers is unconstitutional.
Interpretation No. 737 struck down provisions in Articles 33 and 101 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法), and was widely seen as advancing the rights of defendants, by allowing direct access to case files during bail hearings, which is also perceived as a blow to prosecutors.
Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Lin Chin-fang (林錦芳) said that two articles in the Code of Criminal Procedure had contravened the spirit and intent of Articles 8 and 16 of the Constitution, which guarantee people’s personal freedom and right to due process, adding that people have the right to present petitions, lodge complaints and institute legal proceedings.
The issue arose from a criminal prosecution of former Taipei city councilor Lai Su-ju (賴素如) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), after she was implicated in a corruption scandal in 2013 in which she was accused of taking millions of New Taiwan dollars in bribes related to the Taipei Twin Towers development project.
Some lawyers welcomed the interpretation, saying it was a step toward better protection of citizens’ rights and upheld people’s rights to legal defense.
Lawyer Huang Shih-han (黃仕翰) said the decision is good for legal professionals dealing with the judicial process, but added that “some rules should set out how far it should go, and some limits should be imposed on the right to access case files.”
Huang cited the trial for espionage of China’s Zheng Xiaojiang (鎮小江), in which military secrets were allegedly leaked, and other cases involving national security and highly sensitive government materials, saying: “If defense lawyers were to access and read up on the case files, it might interfere in prosecutors’ work on an investigation. There is also a likelihood of the accused and the defense team destroying or tampering with evidence if they know the direction and focal points of the investigation.”
Grand Justice Wu Chen-huan (吳陳鐶) wrote a dissenting opinion on Friday’s interpretation, in which he said the Constitutional interpretation should have imposed restrictions on cases which “might have endangered national security” and “situations with the need to preserve vital public interests.”
Wu wrote that under such conditions, there should be a ban or limitation on access to information regarding the court’s cited reasons for imposing detention, adding that as this was not done in the interpretation, he disagrees with the majority decision.
He said he also disagreed with the interpretation’s wording, in which the term “the accused” from the cited Code of Criminal Procedure articles was replaced by “the suspect,” which Wu said contravenes the principle regarding division of judicial authorities.
Wu said that Code of Criminal Procedure Article 33, which states: “A defense attorney may examine the case file and exhibits, and make copies or photographs thereof,” pertains to trial procedures in court, and not bail hearings for the detention of an accused during investigation, so the article should not have been included in the interpretation.
Lawyer Lin Chu-feng (林俊峰), a former prosecutor, said he had mixed feelings about the interpretation.
“When I was a prosecutor, I would have opposed this decision, because by accessing case files, the defense can find out details of the investigation, and this could certainly lead to interference and destruction or tampering with evidence,” he said.
“However, looking at things from a lawyer’s viewpoint, a court’s denial of the defense to access case files violates people’s rights,” he said.
The Taipei Department of Health yesterday said it has launched a probe into a restaurant at Far Eastern Sogo Xinyi A13 Department Store after a customer died of suspected food poisoning. A preliminary investigation on Sunday found missing employee health status reports and unsanitary kitchen utensils at Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in the department store’s basement food court, the department said. No direct relationship between the food poisoning death and the restaurant was established, as no food from the day of the incident was available for testing and no other customers had reported health complaints, it said, adding that the investigation is ongoing. Later
REVENGE TRAVEL: A surge in ticket prices should ease this year, but inflation would likely keep tickets at a higher price than before the pandemic Scoot is to offer six additional flights between Singapore and Northeast Asia, with all routes transiting Taipei from April 1, as the budget airline continues to resume operations that were paused during the COVID-19 pandemic, a Scoot official said on Thursday. Vice president of sales Lee Yong Sin (李榮新) said at a gathering with reporters in Taipei that the number of flights from Singapore to Japan and South Korea with a stop in Taiwan would increase from 15 to 21 each week. That change means the number of the Singapore-Taiwan-Tokyo flights per week would increase from seven to 12, while Singapore-Taiwan-Seoul
POOR PREPARATION: Cultures can form on food that is out of refrigeration for too long and cooking does not reliably neutralize their toxins, an epidemiologist said Medical professionals yesterday said that suspected food poisoning deaths revolving around a restaurant at Far Eastern Department Store Xinyi A13 Store in Taipei could have been caused by one of several types of bacterium. Ho Mei-shang (何美鄉), an epidemiologist at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Biomedical Sciences, wrote on Facebook that the death of a 39-year-old customer of the restaurant suggests the toxin involved was either “highly potent or present in massive large quantities.” People who ate at the restaurant showed symptoms within hours of consuming the food, suggesting that the poisoning resulted from contamination by a toxin and not infection of the
BAD NEIGHBORS: China took fourth place among countries spreading disinformation, with Hong Kong being used as a hub to spread propaganda, a V-Dem study found Taiwan has been rated as the country most affected by disinformation for the 11th consecutive year in a study by the global research project Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). The nation continues to be a target of disinformation originating from China, and Hong Kong is increasingly being used as a base from which to disseminate that disinformation, the report said. After Taiwan, Latvia and Palestine ranked second and third respectively, while Nicaragua, North Korea, Venezuela and China, in that order, were the countries that spread the most disinformation, the report said. Each country listed in the report was given a score,