Netizens and civic groups have chosen the character “同” (tong, which means “similarity”) to describe last year’s legislature because it signifies the vibrant support for legalizing same-sex marriage and calls on the government to stand on the same side as the public, the results of a poll organized by Citizen Congress Watch (CCW) showed on Tuesday.
Participants also voted for the top 10 legislature-related news of the past year, with the No. 1 slot going to the Sunflower movement’s occupation of the Legislative Yuan over the government’s handling of the cross-strait service trade agreement in March and April.
The watchdog has organized the poll since 2008 and said that last year’s voting produced the first-ever value-neutral character to describe the lawmaking body.
Photo: Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times
By selecting 同 as the winning character, voters parted with a string of negative characters seen in the past years, such as “假” (jia, “fake”) in 2013, “廢”(fei, “useless”) in 2012 and “恥” (chi, “shame”) in 2011, CCW chief executive Chang Hung-lin (張宏林) said, adding that the legislature should take the neutral result as encouragement.
Since the Sunflower movement, the public have come to hold more positive views about participating in public affairs and to be more attentive toward them, and that reflects why the “similarity” character was chosen, Chang said.
A netizen surnamed Lee (李) proposed “同” as one of the 60 characters that netizens put forward for the vote. In the description attached to the candidate character, Lee wrote: “If government officials saw the world from the same angle as the public, black-hearted bills would not have been rammed through the legislature; if businesspeople could sympathize with consumers, tainted materials would not have been used for companies’ gains; if heterosexuals could empathize with homosexuals, the latter’s right to marriage would not have been blocked.”
The characters that came in second and third were “割” (ge, “to slice”) and “腐” fu, “corrupted”), with “割” referring to the Appendectomy Project organized to recall legislators perceived to be failing to respond to the public’s needs.
The CCW said that the Legislative Yuan occupation topping the news poll reflected participants’ views that the legislature has long been malfunctioning and turning its back on the public. The group said that the while it had continued to call on the lawmaking body to not be the Executive Yuan’s stooge, legislators’ indifference had in the end resulted in the Sunflower occupation, staged by members of the public demanding their rights back.
The piece of news that received the second-highest number of votes was the Appendectomy Project reaching the second stage in its bid to recall Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) and that a recall referendum is to be held soon in Taipei’s Neihu (內湖) and Nangang (南港) districts.
The third-most popular story was KMT Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠) storming through a joint legislative committee review of the controversial service trade agreement in 30 seconds and trying to send it directly to the general assembly, the act that triggered the Sunflower movement.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods