The President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s strong response to exhibition posters that omitted the word “national” from the name of the National Palace Museum smacks of double standards and may be an attempt to pander to China, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers said.
Selected artifacts from the National Palace Museum are to be exhibited as part of Treasured Masterpieces from the National Palace Museum, Taipei at the Tokyo Museum from Tuesday to Sept. 15, and at the Kyushu National Museum from Oct. 7 to Nov. 30.
The Taiwanese museum said that posters referring to the “Palace Museum, Taipei” were a violation of the agreement between Taiwan and Japan in which the museum’s full name must be used in all publicity materials.
The posters in question were prepared by a media group that operates major media outlets, including the Asahi Shimbun, TV stations and other newspapers.
However, official posters and brochures prepared by the Tokyo National Museum itself refer to the museum by its full name of “National Palace Museum.”
DPP lawmakers said that in 2009 when then-museum director Chou Kung-shin (周功鑫) visited China, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Executive Yuan had said the official name for the museum at all times was the “National Palace Museum” to ensure Taiwanese rights, the legislators said.
However, the museum’s own report filed after Chou returned from China backed down from this stance, the legislators said.
The 12th page of the report listed “setting aside political disputes and increasing cultural interaction” as a desired result and said that both sides had decided to temporarily set aside the dispute regarding the museum’s title as well as relevant laws forbidding seizure of cultural artifacts, the lawmakers said.
DPP legislators also said that museum director Feng Ming-chu (馮明珠) had not protested when she saw the same omission while attending an academic seminar in China in November last year.
According to DPP Legislator Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), the Japanese government has run the risk of offending China, with whom Japan has held official diplomatic ties since 1972, by passing the Open Promotion of Overseas Artworks Act in the Japanese Diet.
The act granted Taiwan full jurisdictional authority over the loaned works for the exhibition, Lin said.
Jumping straight to threats to cancel the exhibition, without first contacting the Japanese government, has the potential to severely cripple Taiwan-Japan relations and benefit China, Lin said.
China does not want the museum relics and works exhibited in Japan, Lin said, adding that the response and its timing — one week before China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) is to arrive in Taiwan — smacked of pandering to China.
“We did not see Ma speak up when the museum’s director failed to complain about the omission of the word during her visit to China,” Lin said.
DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) added: “While Ma’s tough stance was welcomed by Taiwanese, his departure from past practice smacks of double standards.”
“Is it truly defending Taiwan’s sovereignty when we bow and scrape to China’s whims, while taking a tough stance against Japan?” the legislator said.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) spokesman Charles Chen (陳以信) yesterday said the KMT supported the Ma administration’s tough stance against Japan.
Chen criticized the DPP for “bending its own position” on Taiwanese sovereignty when it came to Japan, adding that the DPP has no right to be pointing fingers.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiao-kuang
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods