Taipei police yesterday questioned a man for allegedly organizing an online campaign for an “Occupy the Taipei MRT” protest, amid criticism that the government is resorting to clamping down on “thought crime” to curb freedom of expression.
Police located the man, surnamed Chou, a resident of Chiayi County’s Fanlu Township (番路), through the Internet protocol address he used to post a message about the campaign. They said the campaign is against the law.
Reporting to the police department’s Mobile Division, Chou said he did not initiate the campaign and only reposted a message on Facebook, which he did not know was illegal.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
The campaign called for 33,000 people to board Tamsui Line MRT trains at the same time to protest against what the organizers said was the government’s failure to respond to the public’s demand that construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) be halted.
Police said Chou may have violated Article 153 of the Criminal Code by “inciting others to violate the law or disobey a legal order.” If tried and convicted, he could face a maximum of two years in prison.
The police and the Taipei Rapid Transit Corp on Wednesday warned antinuclear protesters against organizing or participating in the campaign, saying such a protest would violate the Criminal Code and participants could face a five-year jail term.
The police launched an investigation a few hours after the message was posted on the Internet.
However, the investigation has been questioned by legal experts and netizens, with lawyer Tseng Wei-kai (曾威凱) saying that it was a “ridiculous political investigation.”
Chou did not break the law even if he initiated the campaign, Tseng said, adding that prosecutors and the police could try to use the case as a warning to stop people from participating in mass demonstrations and expressing their views.
The administration should not distort the law in an attempt to threaten the public, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said.
The Taipei Rapid Transit Corp is wrong to cite Article 50 of the Mass Rapid Transit Act (大眾捷運法) because the proposed activity would neither damage its trains, facilities or equipment, nor interfere with normal operations, Kuan said.
“I do not see any violation in it,” he said.
The government’s response to recent protests has raised concerns among legal experts and rights advocates, who say that it appears to be resorting to punishing “thought crime” and threats to scare people off the streets.
Deputy Minister of the Interior Jonathan Chen (陳純敬) said on Wednesday that the ministry and the National Police Agency were considering implementing preventive detention against “radical protesters and repeat offenders” in mass demonstrations.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) and Minister of the Interior Chen Wei-zen (陳威仁) reiterated the government’s “determination to maintain social order and harmony,” and said that protesters had “hijacked Taiwan’s democracy with their illegal behavior.”
Preventive detention is an absurd measure and the government seems to have adopted an iron-fist policy to oppress the public’s freedom of expression, lawyer Chiu Hsien-chih (邱顯智) said.
“If the Ministry of the Interior has adopted such a policy, it would be the re-emergence of a police state,” lawyer Chan Shun-keui (詹順貴) said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods