The government’s entry ban on a Japanese man who has voiced support for Taiwanese independence is a violation of freedom of speech and ironic given the number of Chinese officials advocating unification who are allowed to visit, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers said yesterday.
Kenji Tanabe, 38, was refused entry and deported in September 2010, four months after he raised a banner in support of Taiwanese independence on the peak of Yushan during an earlier visit, DPP Legislator Mark Chen (陳唐山) told a news conference in Taipei.
“The ban is inexplicable, because the freedom of speech for foreigners should also be protected, let alone considering that Tanabe expressed his views only because he loves Taiwan,” Chen said.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
Tanabe has been barred from entering the country for five years for “jeopardizing public safety, social order and national interests by his public advocacy of Taiwanese independence,” according to the National Immigration Agency (NIA), which said he had engaged in political activities as a tourist.
The Ministry of the Interior’s Petition and Appeal Committee rejected Tanabe’s appeal on Aug. 16, Chen said.
Chen, who served as foreign minister during the former DPP administration, said Taiwanese independence is now receiving widespread support and the immigration agency will have to explain why supporting mainstream public opinion jeopardizes Taiwan’s national interests.
DPP lawmakers said Tanabe’s case was a reminder of the White Terror era and the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) authoritarian regime, when the government considered foreigners’ entry applications on the basis of their political ideology.
Lu Chun-hui (呂俊輝), who represented Tanabe in his appeal of the deportation in 2010, said Tanabe was not informed at the time why he was being deported, and he did not regret raising the banner.
Political views in favor of independence or unification should both be accepted if Taiwan is to be a full and a true democracy, DPP Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said.
However, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) refused to meet Chinese human rights activist Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠) when he visited earlier this year and refused to grant a visa to Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, while Chinese officials who support annexing Taiwan by force if necessary are allowed to visit, Huang said.
NIA Deputy Director Ho Jung-tsun (何榮村) said Tanabe should have only done what a tourist is supposed to do under the Immigration Act (移民法) — sightsee and visit friends or relatives — and he was deported for engaging in extra activities.
“It was that simple,” Ho said.
He said visits of Chinese officials were governed by the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), not the Immigration Act.
Chinese officials are required to submit their itineraries before they visit and would be monitored by the Mainland Affairs Council, Ho said.
However, the agency could also deport Chinese officials if they engaged in “extra activities,” he said,
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods