In all his years of social activism, nothing had been more shocking to him than his first experiences in 1988, when he first felt that the mainstream media’s portrayal of social activism was not truthful and indeed often maligned such activities, National Chung Cheng University associate professor Kuang Chung-hsiang (管中祥) said.
Kuan said his civil media archive project initiated six years ago has helped students record more than 1,500 pieces of news.
“It is an effort to preserve the real sounds and actions of the civic activities that have been passed by, or misrepresented, by the mainstream media,” he said.
Media reform is not just about changing the current circumstances of the media industry, it is also about letting society’s diverse voices be heard in order to have more dialogue, Kuan said.
Unwilling to become simply an academic that talked of grandiose schemes, but did not turn them into reality, Kuan said he took part in numerous protests and rallies appealing for media reforms, and had also worked closely with civic organizations during the six years when he was president of Taiwan Media Watch.
Giving an example of his actions, Kuan singled out an incident in 2006 when the organization protested the headline of an article in the Chinese-language United Daily News for discriminating against psychiatric patients.
“We hired buses to transport patients and staged a protest in front of the United Daily News building, and though the news company did not apologize, the protest prompted organizations for physically handicapped individuals to pressure the Legislative Yuan into amending the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法) and write into law anti-discrimination regulations for the first time,” Kuan said.
“I was very happy that day, because my efforts had helped people regain their rights, and it also shows how citizens truly have [the] power [to affect government policy],” he said.
Media reformation is only a means to an end — a way to implement basic democratic values such as social diversity and promote social equality, to let people see each other for what they are and accept each other, Kuan said, adding that civic organizations and non-governmental organizations needed to make media reform a top priority.
Without media reform, organizations’ voices and opinions cannot be heard, and thus society will not advance, hence leading to an undemocratic society that speaks in a monotone, Kuan said.
In order to implement his ideals, Kuan works with the civil media archive so that social activists may rest assured that their activities would not be edited out and left to be forgotten.
“Today’s news is tomorrow’s history, but while the mainstream media records the history of prominent figures and significant issues, civilian history is being ignored,” Kuan said.
For example, he said, in the 80-second TV news coverage of the massive protest on Aug. 18, during which protesters held an overnight demonstration in front of the Ministry of the Interior building in Taipei over its handling of the Dapu Borough (大埔) incident, almost every news channel only replayed footage of how students climbed over the walls, how they pushed against the police or how Deputy Minister of the Interior Hsiao Chia-chi (蕭家淇) was drenched in water, Kuan said.
However, there was not one channel that reported on the footage of how the event organizers asked participants to lower their voices and not to shout slogans in fear of disturbing patients in the nearby National Taiwan University Hospital, he said.