A group of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators yesterday said they would initiate a proposal calling for a China policy debate to build a party consensus on the direction of future cross-strait engagement at the party’s congress tomorrow.
“China policy will inevitably be a major issue the DPP has to face and a challenge the party has to tackle,” DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) told a press conference.
DPP legislators Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) and Pasuya Yao (姚文智) also attended the press conference and urged the party’s newly formed China Affairs Committee, the DPP’s designated cross-strait policymaking platform, to organize the debate.
The general idea of the proposal is to demand that the party become more inclusive and to listen to various opinions before formulating its cross-strait policies, the lawmakers said, as currently there are only nine members on the committee.
If the debate materializes, it would be the DPP’s first official debate on China policy since 1998, when DPP members last exchanged opinions on cross-strait relations.
The milestone debate went on to become a catalyst for the party’s resolution on Taiwan’s future a year later, which recognized the Republic of China (ROC) as the nation’s current name and said that any change to the “status quo” would have to be determined by Taiwanese in a referendum.
“The resolution in 1999 resolved the complex relationship between the ROC and Taiwan. Relations between Taiwan and China await further discussion,” Gao said.
While such a debate is imperative for the DPP, Hsiao said it would be more difficult to find a proposition and an opposition than in 1998 because party members’ positions on China are much more diverse.
However, Hsiao hopes that the DPP will be able to come up with substantial measures based on the spirit of the 1999 resolution to deal with Taiwan’s plight and the global situation it faces.
A number of topics could be discussed, Pasuya Yao said, such as the marketability of Taiwan independence and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) initiative of “one China with different interpretations,” as well as which initiative would be the best guideline for cross-strait engagement — the KMT’s so-called “1992 consensus,” the “constitutions with different interpretations” initiative proposed by former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) or another initiative.
Lee Chun-yi said that while he did not think the DPP’s policy on China lost the party the presidential election last year, the party must regroup and find a way to counter the ever-increasing influence of China and the pro-China administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Responding to the proposal, China Affairs Committee spokesperson Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) said that the committee is to invite DPP mayors and commissioners, legislators, a representatives of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and civic groups, to its next meeting.
“If the enlargement of the number of participants is not enough, I think party headquarters should consider the possibility of holding a debate,” Cheng said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all