A group of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators yesterday said they would initiate a proposal calling for a China policy debate to build a party consensus on the direction of future cross-strait engagement at the party’s congress tomorrow.
“China policy will inevitably be a major issue the DPP has to face and a challenge the party has to tackle,” DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) told a press conference.
DPP legislators Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) and Pasuya Yao (姚文智) also attended the press conference and urged the party’s newly formed China Affairs Committee, the DPP’s designated cross-strait policymaking platform, to organize the debate.
The general idea of the proposal is to demand that the party become more inclusive and to listen to various opinions before formulating its cross-strait policies, the lawmakers said, as currently there are only nine members on the committee.
If the debate materializes, it would be the DPP’s first official debate on China policy since 1998, when DPP members last exchanged opinions on cross-strait relations.
The milestone debate went on to become a catalyst for the party’s resolution on Taiwan’s future a year later, which recognized the Republic of China (ROC) as the nation’s current name and said that any change to the “status quo” would have to be determined by Taiwanese in a referendum.
“The resolution in 1999 resolved the complex relationship between the ROC and Taiwan. Relations between Taiwan and China await further discussion,” Gao said.
While such a debate is imperative for the DPP, Hsiao said it would be more difficult to find a proposition and an opposition than in 1998 because party members’ positions on China are much more diverse.
However, Hsiao hopes that the DPP will be able to come up with substantial measures based on the spirit of the 1999 resolution to deal with Taiwan’s plight and the global situation it faces.
A number of topics could be discussed, Pasuya Yao said, such as the marketability of Taiwan independence and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) initiative of “one China with different interpretations,” as well as which initiative would be the best guideline for cross-strait engagement — the KMT’s so-called “1992 consensus,” the “constitutions with different interpretations” initiative proposed by former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) or another initiative.
Lee Chun-yi said that while he did not think the DPP’s policy on China lost the party the presidential election last year, the party must regroup and find a way to counter the ever-increasing influence of China and the pro-China administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Responding to the proposal, China Affairs Committee spokesperson Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) said that the committee is to invite DPP mayors and commissioners, legislators, a representatives of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and civic groups, to its next meeting.
“If the enlargement of the number of participants is not enough, I think party headquarters should consider the possibility of holding a debate,” Cheng said.
DISTRUST WARRANTED? The WHO is under China’s control and has become a useless organization, while data from China cannot be trusted, a Control Yuan member said China’s demand that the novel coronavirus that emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, not be referred to with names like the “Wuhan pneumonia” betrays its lack of confidence in itself, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) told lawmakers yesterday. Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Tsai Yi-yu (蔡易餘) asked Su, during a interpellation at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei, for his view on China’s attempts to redeem its national image in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. These included China’s efforts to “bleach” its image, including having WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus publicly praise its handling of the COVID-19 outbreak, and thanking it for buying time
TOO TIRED: Investigators found that the pilot’s lack of alertness could be attributed to a lack of sleep the previous night, when he had slept with his child It was a copilot’s inappropriate operation of the aircraft and the pilot’s insufficient alertness that led to a hard landing of a China Airlines cargo flight on Dec. 13, 2018, the Taiwan Transportation Safety Board said yesterday. Flight CI6844, a Boeing 747-409 which departed from Hong Kong International Airport, landed on the pre-threshold area of runway L5 at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, about 21m before the head of the runway, an investigation report said. The hard landing damaged three runway lights, but none of the personnel on board sustained any injuries, the report said. When approaching the runway, the copilot failed to maintain
REPEAT OFFENDER: The man went outside for exercise on Wednesday and then left his home on Saturday with his girlfriend, officials said A New Taipei City man has been fined NT$400,000 (US$13,221) and ordered into government quarantine after breaking home quarantine for a second time on Saturday. The 25-year-old man, surnamed Chen (陳) returned to Taiwan on Sunday last week and was ordered to home quarantine until Sunday. He was seen leaving his home on a scooter with his girlfriend on Saturday, three days after he was fined NT$200,000 for going outside to exercise, police said. Chen has now been placed in a quarantine center arranged by the district office and health center of the district where he lives, police said. Police warned the public
Taipei residents who stay at hotels in the city during their 14-day mandatory quarantine period are eligible to apply for the city’s NT$7,000 subsidy, with online applications to be launched next week. Taipei Deputy Mayor Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) on Monday said Taipei residents who have COVID-19 Health Declaration and Home Quarantine Notice dated after March 19 and a quarantine hotel receipt for the dates covered by the quarantine period, would be eligible for the subsidy. The Taipei City Government on Sunday told the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) that so many city residents are under home quarantine that about 90 percent of