The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has so many ill-gotten assets that even it has no idea how much its assets are worth and the only certainty is that those assets are the root of all evil in Taiwanese politics because of the unfair competition that came with them, analysts said at a forum yesterday.
“In short, the KMT’s party assets are the root of all evil in Taiwan because of the unfair advantage they created. And despite the KMT having pledged to deal with the issue, the pledge was only an empty promise,” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said.
The forum, titled “Party assets and corruption,” was organized by the Taiwan Association of University Professors (TAUP) and gathered representatives from opposition parties and experts.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
The KMT took over the assets of the Japanese colonial government and countless private businesses and individuals after it fled China and took control of Taiwan, a move many of its detractors have described as outright theft.
The party pledged in 2005 to sell all its assets, which had made it the richest political party in the world. It claims to this day that it placed most of its assets into a trust.
However, the gap between political parties’ financial support remains huge. While the DPP raised about NT$200 million (US$6.7 million) in donations with a month-long “piggy bank” campaign during the last presidential campaign, the KMT made NT$3.5 billion in 2010, including NT$2.9 billion from stock dividends, Lee said.
The KMT earned NT$2.14 billion last year, compared with the DPP’s NT$628 million, according to data released by the Ministry of the Interior.
Those assets have played an important role in the KMT’s dominance in elections at all levels, which is why it has been slow to deal with the issue, Lee said.
The KMT has blocked the legislative proceedings of a draft statute on the disposition of assets improperly obtained by political parties in the legislature more than 250 times and the political party act (政黨法) since 1993, Lee said.
“Not even the KMT knows how much it has in assets … Some say hundreds of billions, while some say trillions,” Taiwan Brain Trust researcher Chen Jin-ji (陳錦稷) said, adding that the party’s tactics to hide its assets have been carefully crafted over the years.
The calculation of the KMT’s total party assets would be extremely difficult and complicated, depending on whether some peripheral groups or organizations, such as the China Youth Corps and the National Women’s League of the Republic of China, are counted, Zero KMT Alliance executive director Lo Cheng-chung (羅承宗) said.
Others said that trying to resolve the ill-gotten assets issue in the legislature would be a waste of time because the KMT has a majority.
Taiwan Referendum Alliance convener Tsay Ting-kuei (蔡丁貴) said the best way would be a massive protest to force lawmakers to pass the political party act and force the KMT to speed up divesting its assets through a national referendum.
“Expecting the KMT’s goodwill on the issue would be a waste of time because the issue has been there for decades. It takes public pressure and action from the people to get things moving,” Tsai said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods