A two-week exhibition of the original diplomatic documents from the end of World War II will be held in Taipei next week to mark the 60th anniversary of the signing of the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said yesterday.
Along with the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, also known as the Treaty of Taipei, the original copies of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, or the Treaty of Maguan, the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Declaration and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender will also be exhibited at the Academia Historica from tomorrow until Aug. 19.
The Treaty of Taipei was signed on April 28 in 1952 in Taipei between the Republic of China (ROC) government and the government of Japan and went into effect on Aug. 5 the same year.
The treaty included the “renouncement to all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratly Islands [Nansha Islands, 南沙群島] and the Paracel Islands [Xisha Islands, 西沙群島]” by the Japanese and that “all treaties, conventions and agreements concluded before Dec. 9, 1941, between Japan and China have become null and void as a consequence of the war.”
The treaty’s wording meant that Japan surrendered its claims over the nation, without stating to whom it surrendered it.
However, the treaty does identify that “nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) and their descendants who are of the Chinese nationality.”
The treaty’s wording also followed the Treaty of San Francisco in 1951, to which both the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) were denied invitations due to the Chinese Civil War leaving uncertain which government was the legitimate representative of China.
However, National Taiwan University (NTU) honorary professor Cheng Ching-jen (鄭欽仁) said yesterday that the historical view of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration was too “pro-China” and avoids the issue of “direct democratic power” and “power to the people.”
Although the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration provide the basis for Taiwan’s legal status, the deciding treaty should be the Treaty of San Francisco, which should annul the both the Cairo and Potsdam declarations, Cheng said.
The Japanese government’s “renouncement to all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa)” had not made clear to which government it ceded the country, which gave the right of government back to the Taiwanese, Cheng said.
However, at the time, Taiwanese were under the autocratic rule of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and were unable to resolve the issue.
Chen also said that the Treaty of Taipei did not state that Japan ceded Taiwan to the ROC.
Even in 1972, when Japan formally established diplomatic ties with China, Japan did not “recognize” that Taiwan was part of China’s territory because it felt that it had renounced the right of government over Taiwan and was in no position to state which country Taiwan belonged to.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all