Liberty Times: How would you evaluate the ongoing government reforms introduced by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration?
Chu Wu-hsien (朱武獻): The problem with the current reforms is that government remains far too large.
When we started reforming the government in 1987, there were about 20 ministries and committees in the government. When the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the presidential election of 2004, it planned to shrink the government to a minimum of 22 ministries and committees.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
After some discussion and compromise, it was agreed prior to the DPP’s defeat in the 2008 presidential election that there would be 26 ministries and committees at most.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) came to power there were 29 government ministries and committees.
The ROC Constitution was originally promulgated for the governance of 400 million people, 35 provinces and 12 cities under the jurisdiction of the Executive Yuan [in other words, it was a Constitution designed for China.]
Despite the KMT’s relocation to Taiwan in 1949, the basic structure of government is still based on the ideals of the nation’s founding father, Dr Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), [which incorporates a National Congress, the five yuans and the Presidential Office].
It is a good thing that the National Assembly has been frozen [following a Constitutional amendment in 2000], but there are still seven yuan-level government agencies, namely the five yuans, the Presidential Office, and the National Security Council (NSC) — the secretaries-general of the Presidential Office and the NSC are on the same pay-grade as the heads of the five yuans.
These are the primary government agencies in charge of policy issues and they have to constantly negotiate with each other, but they all have too many high-level officials nominated by the president.
Take, for example, the treatment our government gives a Control Yuan or Examination Yuan committee member. Not only are they on the same pay grade as ministers, each one has a government vehicle as well as a secretary, an office and an assistant.
In addition, this huge organization also needs a large number of staff, adding to the cost for intra and inter-organization negotiations.
As I constantly tell our civil servants, a civil servant of the Republic of China (ROC) has to be good at negotiating, at least three times better than a Japanese civil servant [because of the large number of people one has to go through].
For example, the Judges Act (法官法), involves members from the Ministry of Civil Service, the Ministry of Examination and the Examination Yuan’s Civil Servants Protection and Training Committee, the Executive Yuan’s Central Personnel Administration (CPA) and the Secretariat and prosecutors under the Ministry of Justice affiliated with the Judicial Yuan.
It took about 10 years for the act to be passed and if it were not for the scandal involving “dinosaur judges,” which caused the public to pressure the government to speed up the process, I do not know how much longer it would have taken.
Meanwhile, there are currently 37 ministries and committees in the second-class government organization ranking. Although the Ma administration plans to shrink that to 29, I am of the opinion that 29 is still too many.
My reason for holding this opinion is because the four committees and ministries under the Examination Yuan are untouched. Add those to Academia Sinica and Academia Historica under the Presidential Office, the National Audit Office under the Control Yuan and the National Security Bureau under the NSC — and even if the Ma administration’s reforms pass, there will still be 30 to 40 ministries and committees in total.
If we compare our government with others around the world, then Taiwan clearly has the most ministry-level government organizations.
According to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) from 2009, the Canadian government had about 24 ministry-level organizations, New Zealand had 22, Japan had 11 and South Korea had 15, the same number as the US.
OECD data show that China, even with its 1.3 billion population, only had 27 ministry-level organizations in 2008.
Taiwan, on the other hand, has nearly 40 ministry-level organizations with a total population of about 22.5 million.
Despite our relatively small population, our government organizations are large and burdened with high-level officials and president-nominated administrative officials. [For example], the Examination Yuan had 19 examination committee members, the Control Yuan has 29 Control Yuan Committee members and the Executive Yuan has about seven or nine ministers without portfolio.
The [financial] cost of keeping just one presidentially nominated committee member is quite high, [not to mention the number of people who are actually on the payroll].
Liberty Times: Do you have any specific suggestions for the Ma administration?
Chu: When the DPP was in power, the Legislative Yuan asked for the total number of ministry-level agencies to be kept at 22. However, since the KMT’s return to power, is has exceeded that number by seven.
The directors of the National Palace Museum and the Academia Historica are now also presidentially nominated minister-level officials, but as they are exempt from attending Executive Yuan meetings, they do not have the power to make policy decisions.
In my opinion, these two units could easily be folded into lower level government agencies under the Ministry of Education; is there really a need for the National Palace Museum and Academia Sinica to be headed by a person with ministerial authority?
There were also plans to combine the Executive Yuan’s CPA and the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting, and Statistics into the Executive Yuan, but now they are independent organizations under the jurisdiction of the Executive Yuan.
The KMT has always been more lenient with itself and harder on others. When the DPP was in power, third-level government agencies were strictly regulated and capped at 50, but since 2010, the KMT had raised the cap to 70, which needs to be discussed.
Take the Control Yuan’s committee members for example. Tasked with monitoring administrative personnel, the committee was originally designed for 445 people when the KMT ruled China. Now it has 29 members, each with the power equivalent to a minister.
In my research I have found that most countries have just one individual monitoring administrative personnel, with at most three. Japan’s National Personnel Authority, which serves in the same capacity, is only staffed with three members. Conversely, the Examination Yuan Committee should only have three to five members.
Even if the Control Yuan is an absolutely necessity [as stated in Sun’s separation of five powers], it does not need so many staff.
It is understandable that each president feels the need to use vacant positions as some kind of political reward. However, under the current circumstance of national financial hardship, we should endeavor to save money from the small things and start slowly shrinking the size of the government.
Translated by Jake Chung, staff writer
This is part one of a two-part interview. Part II will be published tomorrow.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods