Airline passengers making false bomb threats could be jailed for up to three years or fined NT$1 million (US$33,500), the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) said yesterday.
Statistics from the CAA showed that there were eight cases last year in which plane passengers falsely reported explosives aboard a flight or in their luggage. The heaviest sentence issued so far has been a 10-month prison term.
According to the CAA, the case happened in February last year when a passenger posted bomb-shaped stickers on the windows of the airport lounge in Taipei International Airport (Songshan).
The biggest fine issued was NT$50,000, in which an EVA Airways passenger lied to ground crew saying that he was carrying bombs in his luggage.
Meanwhile, four such cases happened this year. The most serious one occurred last month, when a passenger tried spreading false information about the safety of China Airlines by repeatedly calling the airline’s customer service hotline. Dissatisfied with the expensive tickets that the airline had offered, the passenger claimed that a bomb had been placed on one of the airline’s flights to Jarkata.
Article 150 of the Civil Aviation Act (民用航空法) states that any person making a false report of a threat to aviation safety or aviation facilities, or disseminating false information that jeopardizes flight safety, should be subject to imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of up to NT$1 million.
CAA Director-General Yin Chen-pong (尹承蓬) said passengers should think twice before making such a hoax. Not only would they face civil or criminal responsibility, the act would delay the trip for other passengers as well, Yin added.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods