Washington has been lavishing attention on Taiwan, stepping up official visits and saying it will likely allow visa-free travel to the US. The moves are raising suspicions that Washington is trying to influence a tight presidential election in Taiwan later this month.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is seeking re-election, has seized on Washington’s favors, touting them as reasons voters should re-elect him.
Although some local media, including this newspaper, have carried editorials alleging the US has taken sides in the election, US authorities maintain they remain neutral.
Despite US denials, Tamkang University political scientist Edward Chen (陳一新) said the timing of the visa announcement just a few weeks before the Jan. 14 poll “carried political connotations.”
While the US has influenced Taiwan’s politics since it stationed military forces there during the Cold War, Washington has generally kept aloof in presidential elections.
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), the de facto US embassy in Taipei, said that Washington remains neutral this time too, wanting to see a free and fair vote in one of Asia’s most dynamic democracies.
“The United States does not interfere in foreign elections,” AIT spokesperson Sheila Paskman said. “And that includes Taiwan’s.”
Whether or not Washington intended to boost Ma, its recent moves have reinforced perceptions that the US sees its interests better served by him.
Ma has made his signature policy the tying of Taiwan’s high-tech economy ever closer to China’s lucrative markets. Beijing has been delighted, muting past threats of military force.
The result has been to ease tensions across the 160km-wide Taiwan Strait to what some analysts and officials claim are the lowest level since 1949. That, in their view, reduces the chances that the US would be embroiled in a conflict at a time when it is trying to repair its economy, steady relations with Beijing and re-engage in East Asia after a decade of preoccupation with Iraq and Afghanistan.
By contrast, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which is chaired by Ma’s primary presidential challenger, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), generally supports formal independence from China, as opposed to the de facto independence Taiwan has now.
Tsai’s predecessor as party leader, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), frequently “angered” Beijing when he was president from 2000 until 2008.
Though Tsai has backed away from what his detractors have characterized as his “brinksmanship” with China, she has never publicly renounced independence.
There is “no doubt in my mind that Washington would be more comfortable with a Ma win,” international relations specialist Arthur Waldron of the University of Pennsylvania wrote in an e-mail. “One of the traditional and overwrought fears in [Washington] DC is that a DPP administration will come in and ‘make trouble.’”
Polls show a very tight race. Though Ma holds a slight edge, a surge by People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), a former member of Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), would likely take more votes away from Ma than Tsai.
Ma has campaigned as the candidate most capable of building ties with China without sacrificing Taiwan’s close links with the US, still its most important partner 33 years after Washington transferred its recognition from Taipei to Beijing as the government of China.
The US is legally obligated to provide Taiwan with weapons to defend itself against a possible Chinese attack and maintains a large commercial presence in Taiwan, with US$20 billion in investments.
With many Taiwanese visiting the US frequently, visa-free travel would be a popular move.
After the AIT announced that the program could begin soon if a US investigation finds no problems with Taiwan’s security procedures, Ma called it “a major diplomatic breakthrough” that raises Taiwan-US relations to their highest point in 30 years.
Last month, the head of the US Agency for International Development and the deputy US energy secretary made visits to Taiwan that were heavily publicized by the AIT. Such visits have been rare in recent years, to prevent China from charging that Washington is reneging on its recognition of Beijing.
Tsai and her campaign have minimized criticism, fearing that a tiff with Washington would cost her votes. She traveled to Washington in September last year to meet officials and try to set them at ease about her leadership.
Amid that outreach, the Financial Times quoted an unnamed US official as saying that Tsai had created doubts about her ability to maintain stable China-Taiwan relations — a statement that caused a firestorm in the Taiwanese media, which saw it as evidence of US meddling.
Ultimately, analysts say what is at stake is the best way for a small, democratic country to coexist with a powerful China.
“Washington is intervening quietly in Taiwan’s elections,” said June Teufel Dreyer, an Asia specialist at the University of Miami. “What the State Department seems to want is a gradual folding of Taiwan into [China] — a bit like watching one of those protoplasmic creatures oozing around and eventually incorporating its prey. No eagle sinks talons into fish or cat grabs struggling bird, just slow integration.”
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods