The main suspect in Taiwan’s -longest-running criminal case will remain behind bars after the High Court upheld the death penalty for the man accused of spearheading the kidnap and murder of a 10-year-old boy more than 20 years ago.
The court upheld Chiou Ho-shun’s (邱和順) death penalty for the 12th time and confirmed sentences of 10 and 17 years for two accomplices in the alleged murder of Lu Cheng (陸正), who disappeared on his way home from school in Hsinchu.
The case, in administrative limbo because of the Supreme Court’s refusal to confirm the sentence, has long drawn national attention, with judicial reform advocates saying there are numerous flaws in the evidence and confessions, elicited through torture.
After the verdict was announced, Chiou told the court: “I haven’t killed anyone. Why don’t judges have the courage to find me not guilty,” raising his hands as a symbol of being wrongly accused.
The 10-year-old was kidnapped as he was walking home on Dec. 21, 1987, in a high-profile incident that shook the public. The Lu family received a ransom note for NT$5 million and made a NT$1 million payment nine days later, but Lu was never released.
After a tip-off in September the following year, police arrested three juveniles, who quickly confessed to the kidnapping and to the separate murder of an insurance agent. Chiou, in detention for another case at the time, was implicated as head of the criminal ring.
In total, 12 suspects were charged — with police obtaining confessions from all but one of them. As more details surfaced, however, discrepancies emerged in their accounts, including contradictions on where Lu’s body was. Over the years, charges against most of the suspects were dismissed.
Chiou, his then-girlfriend, Wu Shu-chen (吳淑貞), and Lin Kun-ming (林坤明) are the only defendants still in court 24 years after the murder. Wu was given 10 years by the High Court yesterday, one year less than in a previous ruling, and Lin, 17.
Lawyers for the defendants have maintained that the case is riddled with problems, including a lack of forensic evidence linking any of the three to the crime. The murder weapon, Lu’s body and his clothes were never found and the prosecution has based its case solely on confessions.
However, two prosecutors and 10 police officers involved in the case were impeached by the Control Yuan more than a decade ago for using violence and threats to obtain quick confessions, although the confessions were still accepted as evidence.
“This court battle is a stain on our country’s legal [history],” a joint statement from Chiou’s lawyers said after yesterday’s verdict was announced. “The court failed to bravely recognize the mistakes of the past and continues to gloss over [the facts].”
Signaling an apparent unwillingness to accept the High Court findings, the Supreme Court has rejected all 11 previous death penalty rulings, sending them back for repeated retrials that have prolonged the indefinite detentions of Chiou and Lin. Wu has been allowed to live at home.
Groups of judicial reform advocates and opponents of the death penalty gathered outside the court as the verdict was announced.
The latest decision was flawed, said Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation, because the High Court has not yet resolved the inconsistencies that led the Supreme Court to call for retrials.